1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3D15BD5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 9 Dec 2015 07:54:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-vk0-f51.google.com (mail-vk0-f51.google.com
[209.85.213.51])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9337E145
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 9 Dec 2015 07:54:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vkay187 with SMTP id y187so38221443vka.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 08 Dec 2015 23:54:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=jtimon-cc.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=f6rnQmyrh4oT5aB3/N/vgwP4XLpf8kb8cKNiei6gU+c=;
b=gU2QsIvk3GTvO7ICLBmFGR02U1yPa+NGs1wVASRSU8tlSL90jYHjxSmBVDuA/gpMiV
SQOylVpnM3N28Ju9pUNcypuivV9w4MkQUYqj7CBy+po4NosMnUw8mKsLRIY3w0+mItAJ
fbQQ65xDrKRz9pZbriUvWyEKxsSlRW1zxH6xD3aBPKnPjOxdDrMxSx6LJWW56IUgszai
ujGRb+xSipKpTqknhIXtnTTTlV2YNieTrwSV0v0eQZKCzO3clVfenS44+1U6xxNCff+f
g9wPYTFS5EB+lLND5tXqZz89bOzy2KnO9NIytx97+v+JkyNNWSoLKzmhFAPYHwKywCWH
ST4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=f6rnQmyrh4oT5aB3/N/vgwP4XLpf8kb8cKNiei6gU+c=;
b=fXCl3ViTAXW+GgV6tR+WpNmp/r/AWcWSWiibeilhBz+5z8AOpicRx45i5FVodyGf3a
FgdaXiqMztM9rW0R4MxUcg4wGFgYuV3e8JBaWNByAM9khtpZsZdtv0WDKDnN4ekb8GD2
vo354/781ZfLMjrs4tzqIVYxyCD7x5kOzolgKWztPjR5RUupyfnoIZLH/xlYI+51XlT1
L4rApUtiEcr44aPCy5xI+nTP1MfMlPsj/O3r1qeV+cTyJ/T8w60J1RnX57NCqEPSOX24
J4qE8rFOTnEyW5IwtMlzlA6zhfZzOn4W4AL0zcw3ZVT/g12wbQaX+z8R/0kHegEh4XuD
mNyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlLb3mcQm/u+6OlIRqruRNC4gnaW5MIdRvmg0t7e7Gu3Aiy7LcECJWSOwhwCIV/YcyrQl3in1Wr8uzk6h68k5vcHkub1A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.169.137 with SMTP id s131mr3464207vke.144.1449647689702;
Tue, 08 Dec 2015 23:54:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.31.236.70 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 23:54:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgS-jjEVeHf_LErppTadtAaSeBum+KiGHpoo=Jz5BZArsQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAS2fgQyVs1fAEj+vqp8E2=FRnqsgs7VUKqALNBHNxRMDsHdVg@mail.gmail.com>
<20151208110752.GA31180@amethyst.visucore.com>
<CABm2gDpcek=u=Rpe68EMOq6M7Bji9J=s5VvoQWKRqaQDAP5kTw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T1wga3Tandoe2mVGSKdHJytHoc9Ko7HRm2SvJXABEFk9w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgTGYSiAJHZq80rD4UieV8XetS=W0b45b5onWAS9gF-F7g@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T1i50Gvxj18W=n2mYGNpsMrSkDT26CdA3aQqT5FFN86yw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgSxpSat3VOje3-C4zgaRUVJVx-eRJbSYJqhvfR5SvCDwA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAF_2MyUJMdJyh7FKq6UYCtwJZQ59i-pnWT_tFEK5EQx65iwHDQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgS-jjEVeHf_LErppTadtAaSeBum+KiGHpoo=Jz5BZArsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:54:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CABm2gDq4f0ettDhh14jZ0zztSwSJ0Z=KDEeMTOJxTHF8VV+KXw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capacity increases for the Bitcoin system.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 07:54:51 -0000
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> What was being discussed was the location of the witness commitment;
> which is consensus critical regardless of where it is placed. Should
> it be placed in an available location which is compatible with the
> existing network, or should the block hashing data structure
> immediately be changed in an incompatible way to accommodate it in
> order to satisfy an ascetic sense of purity and to make fraud proofs
> somewhat smaller?
From this question one could think that when you said "we can do the
cleanup hardfork later" earlier you didn't really meant it. And that
you will oppose to that hardfork later just like you are opposing to
it now.
As said I disagree that making a softfork first and then move the
commitment is less disruptive (because people will need to adapt their
software twice), but if the intention is to never do the second part
then of course I agree it would be less disruptive.
How long after the softfork would you like to do the hardfork?
1 year after the softfork? 2 years? never?
|
