1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
|
Return-Path: <dave@dtrt.org>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441E0C0001
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 27 Feb 2021 23:38:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A544336D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 27 Feb 2021 23:38:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dtrt.org
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id nOAYlsgo9md9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 27 Feb 2021 23:38:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from newmail.dtrt.org (newmail.dtrt.org [45.79.129.87])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 119674315B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 27 Feb 2021 23:38:32 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dtrt.org;
s=20201208; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:
Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=n31RmasbBhHKiMquxeTG2IgYwtEFP78RI3/dip44xFs=; b=NHlnbz2IWSci+inv9kjE4dcpHR
poBSn72wG66a8rDXFtpp1lxkioLQyZWbgNw0wg7fHC5duTDRWE4RBAWoIfG944YxiI5+EkTna4HCq
16LRblZQtwBeGJPi8wbLsLzXR/JGUX9ARiYTY1mVJalX3jGORhH7oUaLy1AHxoBgSGlw=;
Received: from harding by newmail.dtrt.org with local (Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from <dave@dtrt.org>)
id 1lG9AN-0000dx-GL; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:38:31 -1000
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:37:52 -1000
From: "David A. Harding" <dave@dtrt.org>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20210227233752.q6je6qzofyhmcgn2@ganymede>
References: <CALeFGL1WSSA69ARvJW3di-UC_gz7NV9q7=6zd7s=CHnmttdQFg@mail.gmail.com>
<20210227191934.phk4z6k2chaefxwt@ganymede>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="alevqzpxduefwpij"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210227191934.phk4z6k2chaefxwt@ganymede>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A design for Probabilistic Partial Pruning
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 23:38:34 -0000
--alevqzpxduefwpij
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 09:19:34AM -1000, David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> - Discussion thread 1: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/014186.html
Two particularly useful emails from that thread are:
- https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/014199.html
which links to discussions about the topic prior to 2017, including
discussion about DoS risks that are more important than the
fingerprinting risk I mentioned in my previous reply.
- https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/014227.html
which describes a potential way to distribute data with fewer DoS
risks and less severe fingerprinting than each node storing a
different set of blocks.
-Dave
--alevqzpxduefwpij
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=ZO93
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--alevqzpxduefwpij--
|
