summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/34/06302fdb826aef810e0a533420cea134c6d620
blob: 6bbdde9ed8f05b7439394ec9abb25610a7677e56 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
Return-Path: <willtech@live.com.au>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B360C000D;
 Thu,  7 Oct 2021 08:34:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3CE83E64;
 Thu,  7 Oct 2021 08:34:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id biZp2lsj1yyH; Thu,  7 Oct 2021 08:34:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from KOR01-SL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-sl2kor01olkn0161.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.108.161])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 358AA83D9D;
 Thu,  7 Oct 2021 08:34:22 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none;
 b=XeHVlN7NvMN4uxdT6k9cRVXwDHWFjJOD2xOj/QNQex29d8Qsp3c4ZgHeDVLu6xCof85BVMySBIz6NLaL1zUTtrETyclgA/d32oXMFSA5aNfTpFmYTwgyAJPXCfG8O5oFFIMNrngPxY+x2L3aZBV5TWHJ1eqThv/lOT1pKNXF9nUf2heW43jnZdvHncKdJRrwhf12TEmoJSOi9qRERa7T17dVBJYpLgGFNmy4tkndUzWnyDTJNM9m33unXjLag57Wki+QKwyBSU9/tW89L6B0pGNdyvAUzRVdJHXuEow+WKdYznYEOg0sOsTUfCMejdtdI+VAuoWdcMmCKzUaz+Ls7Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; 
 s=arcselector9901;
 h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1;
 bh=JNkyQFchdvNK0h1nFj9RgcNz7qNgkwsHSLmmdGW9aHo=;
 b=kaPGXyI0BBE2nrqQrf0K/IrGVJM0MIRW1BpDggSyRXwhBr1yZWj4W15I7Tax63bKlg5c35mi7gw+kdhq4g6n5cr5UZGDcEsiefkqQPqVYTT1ruCRHKjbhfvM++VOtV60WUGBs8ruIrxSXS/aP0yopGz2jDyq5Sth265C41q36JZ3PqB6iil9CFopgVSrLns+uoMAO2H166KguTYqgqnKv1F9WZiFbwucCmC1ba8aXNTVSjC+JPxeZxEhc7TKadrh1Wy40S5kf5yeMfe1mm496aWOHTzOJJ++wqpkh8DGMfzV/95oVCsklQr1c1lo2HmN6HCRlXlKMnW0oFOXMmE15A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none;
 dkim=none; arc=none
Received: from PS2P216MB1089.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:1096:301:52::11)
 by PS2P216MB1010.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:1096:301:53::6) with
 Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4587.18; Thu, 7 Oct
 2021 08:34:17 +0000
Received: from PS2P216MB1089.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
 ([fe80::ccbf:fb52:3f6b:fbda]) by PS2P216MB1089.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
 ([fe80::ccbf:fb52:3f6b:fbda%8]) with mapi id 15.20.4587.019; Thu, 7 Oct 2021
 08:34:17 +0000
From: LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH <willtech@live.com.au>
To: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>, ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>, Bitcoin
 Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Thread-Topic: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev]   Removing the Dust Limit
Thread-Index: AQHXuzcgB3XZYzD9l0SU8Sb0t5+l5KvHK44pgAAG2dk=
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 08:34:17 +0000
Message-ID: <PS2P216MB1089B819664D10559BF04F679DB19@PS2P216MB1089.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <CAD5xwhjFBjvkMKev_6HFRuRGcZUi7WjO5d963GNXWN4n-06Pqg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210808215101.wuaidu5ww63ajx6h@ganymede>
 <MkPutJpff5rqUxXFQrEyHZl6Iz0DfrJU_-BQD-y0El65GQFnj7igVfmWU79fPCtiFztUYl4ofzrqeaN0HFMB45YPErY9rYY7_h1XkuTMfvc=@wuille.net>
 <CAJowKgKt=yYdNOYYNsWh7FJ2EH7rz0bd2EjUjmyA=cA6k5cvUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <BtaljKLqpe75GB6pHEPQMF6_L-hBaE0ZCBGaXrUfnHRYeEbCqFWZ12DaMRm5jEADceL3uPfCiL-WU9MOZJ_m54Zi3Pzu0vSFN3nQvuSKvBM=@protonmail.com>
 <PS2P216MB10896EAD8C2FE35F2A897C4B9DB19@PS2P216MB1089.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <PS2P216MB10896EAD8C2FE35F2A897C4B9DB19@PS2P216MB1089.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: en-AU, en-US
Content-Language: en-AU
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
suggested_attachment_session_id: 82ebfd6f-c875-db58-8788-1bf72f836122
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [Uk0fLGmtbpDGBZhM5KmQgd02T8NVo1E3]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: baf16224-9e8e-471b-350e-08d9896d4078
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PS2P216MB1010:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: T7orZgpNelFhyZnC3JFgfCMovTMtDtZpcRRrBbarKPiiMiSbul3T6mNhPH083+J5FIHhQ3RHGrGKiiBZGIF1yzgFzsDcauETi0dWveTuRS2SbKClPfSC4EXZkwdhxkDWITvg+ApHaU7/oofx/J39K5gJYiSZ4t9GrgD9oz6Psx/4fuQVS7IVXiHdriALHHNW70inrjRzSJeoJpFP8sCaY9EkGBWc7h7kd/h0Hs/+nr3ya6l0XB7NamBAQgH0k29tIFIK1v0NOqB8A+6H7qwl6JE5JOXACVW9R6UBnLcFybABC8VRayf/ZGt6RENn0EetxSEMA7UZ9VLuhMM5OcZD/LabWQc2Y3nTbE9slYMf6CNhqIS/9ybKVKufyzNdsJXdGu014nOBiFxXvE+ObQJ4r8cirjJlo5qrqDEtDF2bxvFmSoBMH38BTXGQoBtS9BuFiToS072pBjgncZxbOxHhIu+STXv6q4UvpP5LtFlqM74=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: HoJgfs1lqAEjnu/hGvs9fkW1cidgBkRW8Lv7EeDbivlshGV0RbVz2tWt5xGt00bbkTNjZJpxHCCrv7kPOoERZAPgPVSV8OZ9jkKOVWQTRcuZlXDwdytUwXbL7Ev2jw52oGz+qB+brd2KgAAQGxdceQ==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="_000_PS2P216MB1089B819664D10559BF04F679DB19PS2P216MB1089KORP_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-3174-20-msonline-outlook-af45a.templateTenant
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PS2P216MB1089.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: baf16224-9e8e-471b-350e-08d9896d4078
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Oct 2021 08:34:17.4760 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PS2P216MB1010
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 12:36:19 +0000
Cc: lightning-dev <lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev]   Removing the Dust Limit
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:34:24 -0000

--_000_PS2P216MB1089B819664D10559BF04F679DB19PS2P216MB1089KORP_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Good Afternoon,

The underlying consideration is the same concerning the handling of 1c and =
2c coins in an economy. Although you may argue the cost of counting those c=
oins throughout the course of minting, drafting to banks, paying to bank cu=
stomers, including in change, and at every handling counting, is less than =
the value of those coins, hpwever, the solution in traditional currency is =
to round the value of the transaction either per line of goods or per total=
 before calculating the Grand Total, in which case the payment either from =
a non-utxo set of accumulation in a traditional account or, from a known se=
ries of denominations, is adjusted.

In the case of Bitcoin, the denominations available are effectively the utx=
o set and there is no effective way to round the transactions without accep=
ting overpayments as valid, and with what consideration, in which case the =
protocol may avoid creating dust in change by sending the additional rounde=
d amount that would otherwise be dust to the recipient.

I suppose that this gets difficult where the transaction has multiple outpu=
ts and you could argue to distribute to all outputs as an overpayment. It i=
s the same effectively as rounding to 10c.

KING JAMES HRMH
Great British Empire

Regards,
The Australian
LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (& HMRH)
of Hougun Manor & Glencoe & British Empire
MR. Damian A. James Williamson
Wills

et al.


Willtech
www.willtech.com.au
www.go-overt.com
duigco.org DUIGCO API
and other projects


m. 0487135719
f. +61261470192


This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard this emai=
l if misdelivered.


________________________________
From: LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH <willtech@live.com.au>
Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2021 7:17 PM
To: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>; ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>; Bitco=
in Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: lightning-dev <lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] Removing the Dust Limit

Good Afternoon,

Returning to this subject, there should be no restriction to the value of u=
txo's that keep in one's own wallet as change can be created in any value. =
With obvious intent, the wallet should avoid creating utxo's below the curr=
ent dust limit at the time the transaction is created but it cannot guarant=
ee it.

The wallet should avoid including utxo's that by weight sat/KB are more exp=
ensive to include that their value at the time a transaction is created, ie=
. do not include utxo's in a transaction that lower the input value after f=
ees for automatic utxo selection, however, perhaps consider this is valid f=
or manual utxo selection since it is in every example 'my money' and I can =
spend some of it if I decide.

There is no discipline in complaining that the dust set of utxo's slows dow=
n the process of block validation during mining. Every conceivable computer=
ised business bears the expense of the cost of a database transaction. The =
actual answer to this genuine business concern of database speed is to buil=
d a faster database.

It is correct knowledge to know that the Bitcoin protocol cannot speculate =
as to the future but we can. The case exists where it is conceivable for ex=
ample, that the transaction fee is paid only for the first utxo inclusion i=
n a transaction due to changes to the calculation of block-size. There are =
other easily plausible examples where the inclusion of what is today consid=
ered dust may not be ill-considered.

KING JAMES HRMH
Great British Empire

Regards,
The Australian
LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (& HMRH)
of Hougun Manor & Glencoe & British Empire
MR. Damian A. James Williamson
Wills

et al.


Willtech
www.willtech.com.au
www.go-overt.com
duigco.org DUIGCO API
and other projects


m. 0487135719
f. +61261470192


This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard this emai=
l if misdelivered.



--_000_PS2P216MB1089B819664D10559BF04F679DB19PS2P216MB1089KORP_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-=
1">
<style type=3D"text/css" style=3D"display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bo=
ttom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir=3D"ltr">
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Good Afternoon,</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
The underlying consideration is the same concerning the handling of 1c and =
2c coins in an economy. Although you may argue the cost of counting those c=
oins throughout the course of minting, drafting to banks, paying to bank cu=
stomers, including in change, and
 at every handling counting, is less than the value of those coins, hpwever=
, the solution in traditional currency is to round the value of the transac=
tion either per line of goods or per total before calculating the Grand Tot=
al, in which case the payment either
 from a non-utxo set of accumulation in a traditional account or, from a kn=
own series of denominations, is adjusted.<br>
</div>
<div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
In the case of Bitcoin, the denominations available are effectively the utx=
o set and there is no effective way to round the transactions without accep=
ting overpayments as valid, and with what consideration, in which case the =
protocol may avoid creating dust
 in change by sending the additional rounded amount that would otherwise be=
 dust to the recipient.
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
I suppose that this gets difficult where the transaction has multiple outpu=
ts and you could argue to distribute to all outputs as an overpayment. It i=
s the same effectively as rounding to 10c.<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div id=3D"Signature">
<div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
<div>KING JAMES HRMH
<div>Great British Empire</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div>The Australian</div>
<div>LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (&amp; HMRH)</div>
<div>of Hougun Manor &amp; Glencoe &amp; British Empire</div>
<div>MR. Damian A. James Williamson</div>
<div>Wills</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>et al.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Willtech</div>
<div>www.willtech.com.au</div>
<div>www.go-overt.com</div>
<div>duigco.org DUIGCO API</div>
<div>and other projects</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>m. 0487135719</div>
<div>f. +61261470192</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard this emai=
l if misdelivered.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div id=3D"appendonsend"></div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<hr tabindex=3D"-1" style=3D"display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id=3D"divRplyFwdMsg" dir=3D"ltr"><font style=3D"font-size:11pt" face=
=3D"Calibri, sans-serif" color=3D"#000000"><b>From:</b> LORD HIS EXCELLENCY=
 JAMES HRMH &lt;willtech@live.com.au&gt;<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, 7 October 2021 7:17 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Erik Aronesty &lt;erik@q32.com&gt;; ZmnSCPxj &lt;ZmnSCPxj@proton=
mail.com&gt;; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion &lt;bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfounda=
tion.org&gt;<br>
<b>Cc:</b> lightning-dev &lt;lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt;<br=
>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] Removing the Dust Limit</=
font>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<div dir=3D"ltr">
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
Good Afternoon,</div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
Returning to this subject, there should be no restriction to the value of u=
txo's that keep in one's own wallet as change can be created in any value.
<u>With obvious intent, the wallet should avoid creating utxo's below the c=
urrent dust limit at the time the transaction is created
<b>but it cannot guarantee it</b>.</u></div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
The wallet should avoid including utxo's that by weight sat/KB are more exp=
ensive to include that their value at the time a transaction is created,
<u>ie. do not include utxo's in a transaction that lower the input value af=
ter fees for automatic utxo selection, however, perhaps consider this is va=
lid for manual utxo selection since<b> it is in every example 'my money' an=
d I can spend some of it if I decide.</b><br>
</u></div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
There is no discipline in complaining that the dust set of utxo's slows dow=
n the process of block validation during mining. Every conceivable computer=
ised business bears the expense of the cost of a database transaction.
<u>The actual answer to this genuine business concern of database speed is =
to <b>
build a faster database.</b></u></div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
It is correct knowledge to know that the Bitcoin protocol cannot speculate =
as to the future but we can. The case exists where it is conceivable for ex=
ample, that the transaction fee is paid only for the first utxo inclusion i=
n a transaction due to changes to
 the calculation of block-size. <u>There are other easily plausible example=
s where the inclusion of what is today considered
<b>dust may not be ill-considered.</b></u></div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
KING JAMES HRMH
<div>Great British Empire</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div>The Australian</div>
<div>LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (&amp; HMRH)</div>
<div>of Hougun Manor &amp; Glencoe &amp; British Empire</div>
<div>MR. Damian A. James Williamson</div>
<div>Wills</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>et al.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Willtech</div>
<div>www.willtech.com.au</div>
<div>www.go-overt.com</div>
<div>duigco.org DUIGCO API</div>
<div>and other projects</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>m. 0487135719</div>
<div>f. +61261470192</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard this emai=
l if misdelivered.<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:12pt; col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>

--_000_PS2P216MB1089B819664D10559BF04F679DB19PS2P216MB1089KORP_--