1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pw@vps7135.xlshosting.net>) id 1V9t41-000323-T1
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:37:49 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from vps7135.xlshosting.net ([178.18.90.41])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1V9t40-0005Vu-Nc for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:37:49 +0000
Received: by vps7135.xlshosting.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 58CBC33C7FF; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:37:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:37:42 +0200
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Message-ID: <20130815083741.GA12713@vps7135.xlshosting.net>
References: <CABsx9T3DM72+8HgNWWZ2HaAgZMQGAPn87L9VVKdkbVkS7sd8Tg@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP3bt40ThBcqWLfzuS5508mpbo4Z5qxh9AJs-FRrk0QJsA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP3bt40ThBcqWLfzuS5508mpbo4Z5qxh9AJs-FRrk0QJsA@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key: http://sipa.ulyssis.org/pubkey.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com)
0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is
CUSTOM_MED
-2.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain 1.2 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit,
and not from a mailing list
X-Headers-End: 1V9t40-0005Vu-Nc
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.9 goals
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:37:50 -0000
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:09:48AM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Sounds awesome!
>
> Pieter told me at lunch that headers first cut sync time to 45 minutes for
> him, which is another amazing improvement from the master of optimisations.
Just to make sure nobody expects a magic bullet: this was on a hexacore Xeon
CPU, with several GB of -dbcache, libsecp256k1 for verification, and a very good
network connection. It is repeatable and from random network peers, though. The
code is here:
https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commits/headersfirst
It's usable and seems to be stable (including reindexing, which needs support for
block files with out-of-order blocks now), but I still want to clean some
things up before pullreq'in. There are probably some heuristic tweaks
possible as well - Gregory found that performance is reduced for the first
part of the chain on high-latency networks.
> Pieter, Matt and I also agreed that for maximum impact we should really try
> to ship payment protocol support in at least two clients simultaneously and
> ideally with a big merchant signed up too - to send a powerful message that
> we really mean it. Someone volunteered last week to do it for bitcoinj and
> if he doesn't pull through, I have some old code from EOY 2012 that I could
> update to the latest spec and ship at least some basic support. I'd hope
> that we can get Bitcoin Wallet or MultiBit updates out once bcj has support
> pretty fast.
>
> Also, Jeff said that BitPay want to be a leader in support for the
> protocol. So let's try and co-ordinate release dates so we can make a bit
> of a splash and grab the ecosystems attention.
I believe we do need some wider support than just Bitcoin-Qt, indeed, as
the number of people actually using the reference client as a wallet is
quite low now. Ideally, several clients and merchants start support for it
in a short timeframe...
--
Pieter
|
