1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
Return-Path: <el33th4x0r@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD111CB1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 2 Mar 2016 00:58:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 101FDEE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 2 Mar 2016 00:58:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n186so62878172wmn.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 01 Mar 2016 16:58:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=c1gi6l54WWUZaVdPtHOw7Gw2gzWsuw6g6I0wPqy0wnE=;
b=gur6BqZ6nAkCvC0Gk4pAdnuJguRoXpw5yJcfpLA69x1r1yjUcVmYliTU0XOMc30DOj
wnbxD8khsb0mVM3UEGIQAvHVBF0dhohY/iTRQeFk/gklYBAQVhoyfGAmV/gkKOeppW/W
BvkyarIBOaS8fWsgJswK+3VKsJ7sXx1+JVlPs0OQzWSMkPrla5cNh2PUL6ZEw+522uR0
e9oTYXTUeGezbVkEqXKAsKy4/MMcqIqTWkHMdFQzoEsnjW93R7Mmdu4dSHJGT+LBWDIO
QvTQh8dWW2m26sdrtRkK7SgsbVBBIXLWEGrg6OOt/0gvF2UYS2wd/Me68E1S5BbuYav6
CHJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=c1gi6l54WWUZaVdPtHOw7Gw2gzWsuw6g6I0wPqy0wnE=;
b=lSz239NjJZ59HTbITeUA3w0kgg1RDg1NxlaSFNzOE+gpLkLpQCOZM+KRTSn+SqwLwp
6HUhLacneKsROahPJ6zu0IrxCHhA5ykQPLh+RrEQIFARVCPoQQchu7JnZCryXqnpEFEm
2doVG3okz74mvZ96om5KAlbq0y5R99gdaMMbBm8bHxsr1Sctk53Xkdn/BBbJsrnncN0x
YwSyWwYXeTzOuknPg+0fu9PFhJWLI/r37S83svLHjlVAr7Iw7uLoDnIVUiHZqX62fLES
YKGJOla2numNKEqamFE48TC8g+f6nbkBmyTJu+AP4h5uQ/eVMV/o+JEyKWp/4Vdvpvyr
4WJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIOxKyM9AZCWFce4LZjCw56KsSXsOD09mjQRXbGCKeHoivUMLwg6tm4RmKzM7bJD1JQY9S0RJFddpvLqQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.201.166 with SMTP id kb6mr23319021wjc.125.1456880282689;
Tue, 01 Mar 2016 16:58:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.236.66 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:57:43 -0800 (PST)
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Emin_G=C3=BCn_Sirer?= <el33th4x0r@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 19:57:43 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPkFh0tx6BJ2=pCamtawa=niPfci7-a6Vs-wFo3rXXx6oks0Jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6dc06ebae78e052d065f2a
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 03:04:31 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Guarantees Strong, not Eventual, Consistency.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:58:04 -0000
--047d7b6dc06ebae78e052d065f2a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
There seems to be a perception out there that Bitcoin is eventually
consistent. I wrote this post to describe why this perception is completely
false.
Bitcoin Guarantees Strong, not Eventual, Consistency
http://hackingdistributed.com/2016/03/01/bitcoin-guarantees-strong-not-eventual-consistency/
I hope we can lay this bad meme to rest. Bitcoin provides a strong
guarantee.
- egs
--047d7b6dc06ebae78e052d065f2a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div>There seems to be a perception out there that Bit=
coin is eventually consistent. I wrote this post to describe why this perce=
ption is completely false.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div><div>Bitcoin Guar=
antees Strong, not Eventual, Consistency</div></div><div><a href=3D"http://=
hackingdistributed.com/2016/03/01/bitcoin-guarantees-strong-not-eventual-co=
nsistency/">http://hackingdistributed.com/2016/03/01/bitcoin-guarantees-str=
ong-not-eventual-consistency/</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>I hope we ca=
n lay this bad meme to rest. Bitcoin provides a strong guarantee.</div><div=
>- egs</div><div><br></div></div>
--047d7b6dc06ebae78e052d065f2a--
|
