1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
|
Return-Path: <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88AF53EE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:42:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:08:35 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.bluematt.me (mail.bluematt.me [69.59.18.99])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 800805D3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:42:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [69.59.18.158] (unknown [69.59.18.158])
by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A277CE11A;
Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:33:55 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:33:53 -0700
Message-Id: <DC6D6BE7-8924-4E7D-B40B-D0FE3BB1A057@mattcorallo.com>
References: <CALJw2w5h3jjKAtvzwup=wbGWU7Yf=byuJzzvJm16CMXQAoTmtg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALJw2w5h3jjKAtvzwup=wbGWU7Yf=byuJzzvJm16CMXQAoTmtg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Karl-Johan Alm <karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A860)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Is Signet Bitcoin?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:42:32 -0000
Indeed, Signet is no less (or more) Bitcoin than a seed format or BIP 32. It=
=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Cnot Bitcoin=E2=80=9D but it=E2=80=99s certainly =E2=80=9C=
interoperability for how to build good testing for Bitcoin=E2=80=9D.
> On Oct 14, 2019, at 19:55, Karl-Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lis=
ts.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BFHello,
>=20
> The pull request to the bips repository for Signet has stalled, as the
> maintainer isn't sure Signet should have a BIP at all, i.e. "is Signet
> Bitcoin?".
>=20
> My argument is that Signet is indeed Bitcoin and should have a BIP, as
> this facilitates the interoperability between different software in
> the Bitcoin space.
>=20
> Feedback welcome, here or on the pull request itself:
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/803
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
