summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/32/265ff534033639dec0f03f543f2aa74eaba4fd
blob: b0b54fb9a13fbd6540d948858901d6220aebaa87 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB33B721
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 30 Oct 2015 03:35:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com (mail-ig0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.213.182])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4D4F128
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 30 Oct 2015 03:35:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igbdj2 with SMTP id dj2so2989085igb.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=iNL04aM5c2HDk65vKgm/f6p6ajqszT9keLJqHG4T6ho=;
	b=1Jx2N+7WaHFDvNnHrVcBsI4LRusscfckpMYVtkEGua2y/XZ9IAlZBfHMHwv+SWkmmw
	bGif54nZn+LxZdZNK/bXNaLREicTkeiP7iI9+kfrGleGxWHeBcXXECa59b6mv6bXT/pl
	JRUTJ9aXsVn2x78Obw/jhSwWlDtj6dxpa/haec4x9PQWkmKCdxvbuWaABOCJr0GF4V31
	+lAU06iMnHyO9qN8JnDVCMbtlcDeBgqcym2wbH8KhIu9xQ4bF/rjQQWbMGf557gRAKW/
	mqnAuCtZULvzFGHsq2nphmtIxK3NKGiwKuVKKFElKKLFJ5Eiv0TZCow1wa9S4Qmqzqn1
	bRxA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.27.10 with SMTP id p10mr715575igg.66.1446176133409; Thu,
	29 Oct 2015 20:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.192.199 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5632DE33.7030600@bitcartel.com>
References: <5631C363.5060705@neomailbox.net>
	<201510290803.52734.luke@dashjr.org>
	<5632DE33.7030600@bitcartel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 03:35:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgTga_vTfOKrFu_hEzXSfTfg9FRfJ6aL6ginuGFqnbm7=w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Simon Liu <simon@bitcartel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	telemaco <telemaco@neomailbox.net>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [patch] Switching Bitcoin Core to sqlite db
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 03:35:35 -0000

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Simon Liu via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Given that UTXO storage is considered critical, it seems reasonable to

This sounds like a misunderstanding of what consensus criticial means.
It does not mean that it must be right (though obviously that is
preferable) but that it must be _consistent_, between all nodes.

> full node and keep up with the network, why not let those users with the
> resources to operate big iron databases do so?  It would be a good
> feature to have.

Because it provides no value, the data is opaque and propritarily
encoded with a compression function which we may change from version
to version, and because many of these alternatives are enormously
slow; enough that they present problems with falling behind the
network even on high performance hardware.

Moreover, additional functional which will not be sufficiently used
will not adequately maintained and result in increased maintains costs
and more bugs.