1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
|
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 188D4CA1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 22 Dec 2017 01:15:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ua0-f196.google.com (mail-ua0-f196.google.com
[209.85.217.196])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09FED3D9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 22 Dec 2017 01:15:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua0-f196.google.com with SMTP id q22so6812803uaa.9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 21 Dec 2017 17:15:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:cc;
bh=yoJQl9SzFD5SIvZC0387ssDLXdC8DqAG7dtcwcC0WT0=;
b=F8JjOYUZyRLOmZdGeADqD5eSH2MFv324MKOaaz6H7W5T4p2OzRAR9Ox4hU7lE60BOB
7flk8pPO5ktQS2r6Hc9p41GfJegdFvXUdoP+HFVFI7v1M8eW6QqueIaGWu90Ig3Ngsf/
ip1LZER1pExzxsF5Zv+O4rozJ5y3Qg+f9lpEDV0IIidEwUXM0x3TcHOnl4UL7lnWjnvp
U4s9qW3kyEhXyte0BIm9GJXyneVym//ZeyRNj9/X/yH9tR1YCf7UBDq147CEZp6EgmwB
QWMuvHVcLAQ/HtqnuoU7HuS85KniPhQhoHFaVwC0RRfNOCpXEeNQm/Swpbtm8bXkzEnX
o7nA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=yoJQl9SzFD5SIvZC0387ssDLXdC8DqAG7dtcwcC0WT0=;
b=htF54HibF7sMcCCRrEac+ChRHoVB3pKzNyrwZTdseZ62iPGWjZB7ss4CYW+lXCO4lV
sX8+1EVc56HlynMp5QzIiCDj7rX7B5M8gPRLJpdKRNU/+KWPqSyG4+MT9tS8hhL6mdqp
hLvABSvAAm/rOUVwzlLUjP5m6ixFixZc4EPgU1xJ9ggbX9iB5plyCUCamyocWtzGh2H9
lVgWDNZZZD9hO7sdZrO2OwKFR1MD0NOzyi1SyK80MSj3/SWPmbFdlHpx6UsS5evdBz+e
uPhN3Moa9GU26rgH7GIjlB3EQUm9p48/Oy6qU48I4d0xmhCnMGDkS4jPY9zdEdlbpdDq
34Cg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJmnsp+mlXT2kAtY4k893wMDyZhiklyfbU6E4IOeGx0WQGe+1vN
h5AyLLyaPvA0XIvqlKZOF1bYUcNQLsRtJQaVYG0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosvtDfEBob2twkWADvcAYdqvgvkwzlFtsmoF39jbBPNH2bEQk4xgfTSIzE58S/LYxoap83BoHU2gsrkBYrT/+g=
X-Received: by 10.159.32.135 with SMTP id 7mr13846157uaa.61.1513905347174;
Thu, 21 Dec 2017 17:15:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com
Received: by 10.103.85.148 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 17:15:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9EB76B68-E8AC-4BE8-8279-BA18033CBF9F@friedenbach.org>
References: <CAKaEYhJ0vC8wf9yYjovfoZLB-TTvEnVB2a3mkC-YDzmnLwtz1Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgQSNdzuiPS3AZ_TjQ2OvkhYJ3ZJUBo7ovP6_O2snuwEMg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAeo5+gYrr=KaqrLibmAoUWG4F_EdR5SQTE9U6-jsYYVT23kTQ@mail.gmail.com>
<9EB76B68-E8AC-4BE8-8279-BA18033CBF9F@friedenbach.org>
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 01:15:46 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: FallGsM3bbADG-CSB-m2pI7h3sI
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgTkfNcJuFPPwppwOt9mvWp4nX3FyhJBmZyTbg=3ZsNDBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Total fees have almost crossed the block reward
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 01:15:49 -0000
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Every transaction is replace-by-fee capable already. Opt-in replace by fee
> as specified in BIP 125 is a fiction that held sway only while the income
> from fees or fee replacement was so much smaller than subsidy.
The distinction is does a next fee replacement hit the next block 99%
of the time or does it do so with 10% probability each successive
block that the original remains unconfirmed; eventually converging to
the same 99% but only after a non-trivial additional delay. As a
result it's still useful to flip it on.
I believe electrum has been defaulting to opt-in without any big problems.
There was discussion in the bitcoin core weekly irc meeting today
about defaulting it on. Some expressed the view that perhaps it
should be left off by default for the RPC because some industrial
users but I'm of the view that those users are both most likely to
want it on and also the most able to see it in the release notes and
change their settings.
|
