1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
|
Return-Path: <tomas@tomasvdw.nl>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F008F3EE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 5 May 2017 13:09:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
[66.111.4.28])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CAA0F0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 5 May 2017 13:09:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BE320A23;
Fri, 5 May 2017 09:09:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213])
by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 May 2017 09:09:17 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender
:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=vI7DEp7d5b4r25MoNFxnL4ciwM9vo
sUToDMiZZG1/ow=; b=UL8jV74Q887Rp8NNXrTrMwrixavrbiqibHTfRzQ4nYdQc
sZKYAdF3e155oYcwYEwgcHVH6RZdLSw//Dcn3Uxz2b0W8RenEsf/J2thFxNeaARd
0GkyD6CP2Qul5OP8q3iHW++pG0bP6+Dwd15jCGLjEJTAlvW5hvNaAI4OOg1D5qJ5
4cvt0QV6dsDfgWQ2g5C1gerEtRfEt7PXtr37q4w77eLd48O4FYs46hSNO2e/sS4e
1JlyXTfhzpnDWFtPF2sfvVjoLt+F1NPyCPQyq6MODFwPLHmaHRQdzDh6t5zH1reE
TwnM20QDBpylPmbtiPq3Rj1b/4NF+kO6nX0aLGrqg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:fXkMWRdXlug0Rcqh5bOWS-RYqNQkVsV86Dk4gA5Waez-NN8qMv8exA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99)
id 6F0E79EC44; Fri, 5 May 2017 09:09:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1493989757.1477512.966870152.4C72B056@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Tomas <tomas@tomasvdw.nl>
To: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_149398975714775122"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-6cc55fe1
Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 15:09:17 +0200
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 May 2017 13:10:06 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Non-confirming block signalling
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 13:09:19 -0000
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--_----------=_149398975714775122
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sorry, I wasn't aware. This is indeed the same proposal.
On Fri, May 5, 2017, at 15:01, Bryan Bishop wrote:
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Tomas via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-
> dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:>> I propose a method to mark blocks to indicate that they were
>> generated>> without verifying the previous block. This can be done by using
>> a bit of>> the version field.
>
> see also:
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/011853.html>
> - Bryan
> http://heybryan.org/
> 1 512 203 0507
--_----------=_149398975714775122
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div>Sorry, I wasn't aware. This is indeed the same proposal.<br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>On Fri, May 5, 2017, at 15:01, Bryan Bishop wrote:<br></div>
<blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Tomas via bitcoin-dev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br></div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex;"><div><div>I propose a method to mark blocks to indicate that they were generated<br></div>
<div>without verifying the previous block. This can be done by using a bit of<br></div>
<div>the version field.<br></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>see also:<br></div>
</div>
<div><div><a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/011853.html">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/011853.html</a><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><div>- Bryan<br></div>
<div><a href="http://heybryan.org/">http://heybryan.org/</a><br></div>
<div>1 512 203 0507<br></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote><div><br></div>
</body>
</html>
--_----------=_149398975714775122--
|
