1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
|
Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4708BE9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:19:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606A0AD
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:19:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown
[IPv6:2001:470:5:265:a45d:823b:2d27:961c])
(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7EA238A230B;
Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:18:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Hashcash: 1:25:170406:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::j4iFK4bVPK78r2wV:a+uB4
X-Hashcash: 1:25:170406:chjj@purse.io::ZKl+fvYipD67h01m:cbnBO
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Christopher Jeffrey <chjj@purse.io>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:18:35 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.9.16-gentoo; KDE/4.14.29; x86_64; ; )
References: <20170405165405.GA28519@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170405165405.GA28519@gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201704061718.35638.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Extension block proposal by Jeffrey et al
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 17:19:09 -0000
On Wednesday, April 05, 2017 4:54:05 PM Christopher Jeffrey via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> There's understandable confusion about this, but this proposal is not
> meant to be a BIP.
Oh? If this was not meant to be a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal, perhaps you
should clarify somewhere what altcoin you are proposing it for. As it stands,
it certainly did read much like it was meant to be a BIP, and apparently many
others thought so as well.
Admittedly, the bitcoin-dev ML isn't the place for altcoin discussions, and
I'm not particularly interested in spending my time aiding altcoins, so I'll
just end the conversation here until someone re-proposes something similar for
Bitcoin.
Sorry for confusing the nature of your work,
Luke
|
