1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
|
Return-Path: <dave@dtrt.org>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC0CC000E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 16 Jul 2021 21:43:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6009160652
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 16 Jul 2021 21:43:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.725
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.725 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_XBL=0.375,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dtrt.org
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id AfTjraZ7uU5W
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 16 Jul 2021 21:43:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from newmail.dtrt.org (newmail.dtrt.org
[IPv6:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fe7b:78d1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08AED60701
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 16 Jul 2021 21:43:33 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dtrt.org;
s=20201208; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:
Subject:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=zO4ec0FIn4fgHQdD41/9MdEqfqUwbhX0yu7enfvTVdU=; b=6U3iaR7yC621OP0F3tjtUft1x4
RfNHZRL74fpq/gPsUC11SPGsibftyFmkgEPHFtsVDptHS98pQG+v4e2Zn4602e11RJcmLgfy8dL26
qR5j6NFoqelIHMpBpHnZINs4PzDnZdPf//137EyQMnXPqqKuHnr1NHIBIRrfCU8De/n8=;
Received: from harding by newmail.dtrt.org with local (Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from <dave@dtrt.org>)
id 1m4VcJ-0004lB-PH; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:43:31 -1000
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:42:16 -1000
From: "David A. Harding" <dave@dtrt.org>
To: Karel Kyovsky <karel.kyovsky@generalbytes.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20210716214216.mtc6h55ahopxt32q@ganymede>
References: <CALSqm3bG0pYhPvGQd-uxN5fTQXS_rbzQFq3L5+d2xbaLUuCE3Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4fc7zsnc7ywjr776"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALSqm3bG0pYhPvGQd-uxN5fTQXS_rbzQFq3L5+d2xbaLUuCE3Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Travel rule, VASP UID and bitcoin URI - A new BIP
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 21:43:35 -0000
--4fc7zsnc7ywjr776
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 04:35:21PM +0200, Karel Kyovsky via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I would like to propose a standardization of [a new] bitcoin URI parameter name
> [...]
> My question is: Should I prepare a completely new BIP or should I prepare a
> modification of BIP21?
Please use a new BIP. See BIP72 for a previous instance where another
URI parameter for BIP21 was standardized.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0072.mediawiki
(I think your compliance situation is mostly off topic for this list, so
I'm not commenting on that.)
-Dave
--4fc7zsnc7ywjr776
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=o524
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--4fc7zsnc7ywjr776--
|
