1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00352C002B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 5 Feb 2023 12:06:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EE4606F9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 5 Feb 2023 12:06:39 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 86EE4606F9
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=n3FT+kkM
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 8Lug_5lUdOnn
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 5 Feb 2023 12:06:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 42CE5606EC
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com
[64.147.123.20])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42CE5606EC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 5 Feb 2023 12:06:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44])
by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F7F32007F1;
Sun, 5 Feb 2023 07:06:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 05 Feb 2023 07:06:36 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to
:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender
:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender
:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1675598795; x=1675685195; bh=J
ja8ATwV2F/Ikk9h4GqiCoOqEnyFrCqCKCnJ02Lh8Fw=; b=n3FT+kkMb2DQKvN6F
PD3HuqT+WMB13zbX6xCo+/rAaC2S+mgNOp+V6LREXN1r7CsGJNrompqGIO7pK/rB
Tj3OqtJgn2em1l9qU+w35yMLnOzWybRGbGA5JLWieXB7dmaycxN340UiYvfMnsEO
kk3X/+ftMsnx3ZFf4AWMsEm7ENGPU47MqqawTSFD77lzz/nwxYYPVrmGJam51IZa
bpqc5AOd45Eh4LvAVUIHIgDJxByhD50sQ8RDso+thCU9SQLqUtqMb3mh+U2jCP1g
9b/XQhGs+W67CbKn1zuO6v9CrgWLHryHIy0EbBqhms3hl9+GPMVZ4+3j4C8PXhmF
OG7gg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:y5vfY_ZtaEicwbjCNg9LHYlPeVsMbBFYuinHknceKtXSUhtwJVtVdQ>
<xme:y5vfY-bx_6G5KbmYVeBEd9DCYrxU0XtRx5lvYev007qMxMDw4JlivjNJzI8QvSZFu
B053U8miLgDZRmzo_8>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:y5vfYx_7tliwlc8Y7-iqQ6wtbj_Q8ATAFljyJXW5x6KgTwUQji6z2-pi0Uef>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudeggedgfeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
cujfgurhepfffhvffufggjfhfkgggtgfesthhqmhdttderjeenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv
rhcuvfhougguuceophgvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtth
gvrhhnpefhteeuleffvddujeejteejjefgjeefleeiieejudeiiedvueegffefueeglefg
ueenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpvg
htvgesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:y5vfY1oy_tLoLqNkpppmYVyt9rS3m3q8SuV5ikzKA99esMAPnP33XA>
<xmx:y5vfY6oQtOpzhWajak6T9pmrdwKRrdjnZTGHbX4c5yVDSwRN7wT5Ow>
<xmx:y5vfY7RwQv8FXJ4Ofq023abRaAjPtPNIgkd_JiaAtzyUMdx-SujLfA>
<xmx:y5vfYzmw2TV4a_ORi2Mkq9oSeJhJNpk-pkJAG7nFti3_Uvu1trhCRQ>
Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun,
5 Feb 2023 07:06:34 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:06:33 +0100
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <0267d5bb-a54b-894b-3d45-e6cb89eb86a5@peersm.com>
References: <CACrqygAMsO1giYuxm=DZUqfeRjEqGM7msmEnZ-AHws3oA2=aqw@mail.gmail.com>
<ca8622cb-445e-4258-bbac-b3ee1ce95f4c@protonmail.com>
<57f780b1-f262-9394-036c-70084320e9cf@peersm.com>
<CACrqygCNf3Gv8+VjhyqS4GTb3Epo8qXEKGtQB6sqyR6ib44-fA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABE6yHtM2Dqc63_eURSr7dMirJti5sYnqvHj7vQ_Ab9FC_d04g@mail.gmail.com>
<3d00aacb-585d-f875-784d-34352860d725@peersm.com>
<CACrqygB_FbsRGWYPSUEFTnP15y94Hmo4JtAuv6bH1D3YtbAw9Q@mail.gmail.com>
<b292d887-cbd5-165c-de01-793df2b5e8f3@peersm.com>
<CACrqygAv842ucN7PLYMENXFiSwAZJy2Y+FziJXrWjyCcOXmL3g@mail.gmail.com>
<230265ee-c3f8-dff3-9192-f0c8dc4d913c@peersm.com>
<28C74556-8AB4-4E16-AC7D-7F3FAA0A29AC@petertodd.org>
<0267d5bb-a54b-894b-3d45-e6cb89eb86a5@peersm.com>
Message-ID: <B7A37621-AC21-43FE-A60D-7516FFD69FCF@petertodd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE
OP_IF OP_PUSH
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 12:06:40 -0000
On February 5, 2023 12:40:38 PM GMT+01:00, Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm=
=2Ecom> wrote:
>I think logically:
>
>- if you want to store something big and can afford several txs in your
>design, then you use something like witness
>
>- if you want to store small things like signatures, addresses hashes
>and some metadata and your design does not make several txs easy, then
>you use OP_RETURN
>
>Then how can we move forward with several OP_RETURN and no size limit?
Because what matters is the impact on other users=2E OpReturn isn't in UTX=
O space and doesn't even take advantage of the witness discount, so it clea=
rly has minimal impact=2E
Since it has minimal impact, there's no reason to micromanage exactly how =
people use it=2E Let them decide for themselves with the fee market=2E This=
is exactly the same as how we didn't put artificial limits on Taproot=2E
|
