1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jgarzik@bitpay.com>) id 1XSnvX-0001Zd-3J
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 13 Sep 2014 14:03:47 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
designates 209.85.223.176 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.223.176; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
helo=mail-ie0-f176.google.com;
Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1XSnvW-0004QH-4c
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 13 Sep 2014 14:03:47 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ar1so2475852iec.21
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 13 Sep 2014 07:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=P1SrVyXFsF0Z1bLKLO0AyhTREeFXeN8otlXiAhnMyPA=;
b=JdeWImFSMxwUygYyv9LXUdkOBSRXahGjS1qc3+vM8rvbRLk0dfEIiPOGnMRlGJNPBi
lOiDYawlPXwSLI4DDpcYi3p0CL3L/mjArfImBvsd31UiV8kin82VT303x8Dmgt81bqOb
HR6WE5s9n06WGPm9PtSYPGPoGGSYd04p15rRdvSrkW3MuG35+CC/dvbWi3aKNo6HXOF0
iJREfBY5U3koxRw9q/yhbgzicvK0BS9FqBks+wvV3JlCHO+qYqWSpKf44IdZUuUpzN8O
eKi7jHQbP2dlKGDRRz0sDwM9nvCUeRCzfp4wHSnarUNaznn82hABRPAo8ApA0GyZLewb
3cWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnYhwluRqksNF7dCkmxC8gKTq0+WUo5/qtpPAGdpGYPxEPcDILblVKwkenkwNX/fBr8Kr4P
X-Received: by 10.43.64.77 with SMTP id xh13mr1743124icb.75.1410617020234;
Sat, 13 Sep 2014 07:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.153.149 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 07:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140913135528.GC6333@muck>
References: <20140913135528.GC6333@muck>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 10:03:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0MaE3Ki5Hs4Tu4dQNBW-EL-857N2kf-fVxYcXM6OO-84w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1XSnvW-0004QH-4c
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Does anyone have anything at all signed
by Satoshi's PGP key?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 14:03:47 -0000
That claim is horse manure :) He never signed private emails sent to
me, nor the forum posts.
He -might- have signed the occasional thing related to releases, I'm not sure.
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> So far I have zero evidence that the common claim that "Satoshi PGP
> signed everything" was true; I have no evidence he ever
> cryptographically signed any communications at all.
>
> --
> 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> 00000000000000000ce4f740fb700bb8a9ed859ac96ac9871567a20fca07f76a
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Want excitement?
> Manually upgrade your production database.
> When you want reliability, choose Perforce
> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
|
