1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <stick@gk2.sk>) id 1VhqY2-0005FM-N3
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 17 Nov 2013 00:49:10 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mail-ee0-f49.google.com ([74.125.83.49])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VhqY1-0008Jy-1L
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 17 Nov 2013 00:49:10 +0000
Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id b47so63823eek.22
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 16 Nov 2013 16:49:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=DNt0FRxYPNvSktsxaOJ9pzJLwPYB9bbv8YDKm8Yqo/Y=;
b=cLg7CkPO/FxM0qcgcQhV1TH/s2pNCkKRjDdnT8F78v60IE5NQ9mcEaQHbcgMaNwfv4
1un8KtpD29qAd19HZgo5gJ9OZVkicjN6d6zuBhrKDjDn2GEjTcJPMWIb1qgfY+7ZMcqg
nSnUm0IeY24ghCIOU5Li+K72ZtM1TFBT0TEuA93xzRwgF99wXe1zca4WogLR+vj2yrPV
pPe6gOzlpQN3UpZIiquzL4tq9clI5QKOstLEnSVNgM/9PPUX84MH3e0BPqw/uzYrn4Zo
rpyhGRKlNrxBetBOE1IaGJVs923RUH2RBJY4f0pv/F0mgqPiNRw1YqgLLRS4GZVykrpI
Bo3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmYWneWs4cYnGMxEbufx9zdmTHRIiGpZYw5QsSxvu3o+sJiimQq7gb9Sds4DGUgNZGV27ws
X-Received: by 10.14.179.130 with SMTP id h2mr1896128eem.34.1384649342479;
Sat, 16 Nov 2013 16:49:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tetra.site ([91.239.236.39])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w6sm21830784eeo.12.2013.11.16.16.49.00
for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Sat, 16 Nov 2013 16:49:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5288127C.5010605@gk2.sk>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 01:49:00 +0100
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: timo.hanke@web.de
References: <526BDEC2.2090709@gmx.de>
<CAJna-HgH1g8iiSvxXrJuga808SQJ6DKo4AYw4fxpwTRCsL+EyQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBiuLJJV3pB-EF3O9sgB_Z3tuLhEg9k=A9mcxJvgy3UQSw@mail.gmail.com>
<52721F47.30206@gmx.de>
<CAJna-Hj+q7oyTj8SWiVESPt5Web-mLuDhv7yA8zF5wRD81aBXA@mail.gmail.com>
<5274C99A.8060304@gmx.de> <20131103064111.GI16611@crunch>
<5275F55A.1030805@gmx.de> <20131103074052.GJ16611@crunch>
<52880470.2060206@gk2.sk> <20131117004239.GA24383@crunch>
In-Reply-To: <20131117004239.GA24383@crunch>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: gk2.sk]
X-Headers-End: 1VhqY1-0008Jy-1L
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to replace BIP0039
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 00:49:10 -0000
On 17/11/13 01:42, Timo Hanke wrote:
> p.s. The question about auditing entropy would only apply to the generator,
> not the wallet. Is it yet documented how Trezor proves that external
> entropy was used?
We'll probably use the most straightforward way:
a) trezor prints entropy A on a display (probably in hex format, this
step is triggered by sending a special flag in initialize message)
b) trezor receives entropy B from external source
c) trezor creates sha256(A + B) and uses that as a seed
d) trezor prints used seed on a display (probably in BIP39 format)
e) user can check on a trusted computer that everything was ok
(note that steps b-d are the same regardless of whether the special flag
was set)
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
|
