summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/2d/d75e8452f32ff6fef485744436ab99ccd35fc1
blob: 64955966d66ef6aa502779fda2a0a68602893d72 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <apoelstra@wpsoftware.net>) id 1YE2Ib-00047A-UD
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:54:49 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from wpsoftware.net ([96.53.77.134] helo=mail.wpsoftware.net)
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YE2IX-0003kS-M8
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:54:49 +0000
Received: from shavo.vs.shawcable.net (Cisco01253.vs.shawcable.net
	[192.168.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by mail.wpsoftware.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t0LKRbN2001453
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256
	verify=NO); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:27:38 -0800
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:27:37 -0800
From: Andrew Poelstra <apoelstra@wpsoftware.net>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150121202736.GZ29138@shavo.vs.shawcable.net>
References: <CAPg+sBhk7F2OHT64i2LNSjv8DR5tD3RJkLJGzPGZW8OPQTCjQw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4tkssvp36SW1tyIS"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBhk7F2OHT64i2LNSjv8DR5tD3RJkLJGzPGZW8OPQTCjQw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22+19 (8f62001989cc) (2013-10-16)
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
X-Headers-End: 1YE2IX-0003kS-M8
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:54:50 -0000


--4tkssvp36SW1tyIS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


I've read this and it looks A-OK to me.

Andrew



On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 07:35:49PM -0500, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>=20
> We've been aware of the risk of depending on OpenSSL for consensus
> rules for a while, and were trying to get rid of this as part of BIP
> 62 (malleability protection), which was however postponed due to
> unforeseen complexities. The recent evens (see the thread titled
> "OpenSSL 1.0.0p / 1.0.1k incompatible, causes blockchain rejection."
> on this mailing list) have made it clear that the problem is very
> real, however, and I would prefer to have a fundamental solution for
> it sooner rather than later.
>=20
> I therefore propose a softfork to make non-DER signatures illegal
> (they've been non-standard since v0.8.0). A draft BIP text can be
> found on:
>=20
>     https://gist.github.com/sipa/5d12c343746dad376c80
>=20
> The document includes motivation and specification. In addition, an
> implementation (including unit tests derived from the BIP text) can be
> found on:
>=20
>     https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commit/bipstrictder
>=20
> Comments/criticisms are very welcome, but I'd prefer keeping the
> discussion here on the mailinglist (which is more accessible than on
> the gist).
>=20
> --=20
> Pieter
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>=20

--=20
Andrew Poelstra
Mathematics Department, University of Texas at Austin
Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web:   http://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew

"If they had taught a class on how to be the kind of citizen Dick Cheney
 worries about, I would have finished high school."   --Edward Snowden


--4tkssvp36SW1tyIS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUwAu4AAoJEMWI1jzkG5fBSdUIAJpT4qg00B+/qwZqXEzvA/un
yGgKqgt3B4XH3yO9Ih1rtCvc3LuZSSL+mTLRY2buoGN3X6xPn+IjlwLZrYwdxLRs
J7WsXG/2ROK10Fiq8Ejl8vzY0L6Y+ZG03RznBViyGxcdRpN9iYcxFi+Ju78VRspE
574Raov6xHZxUdDYP6RMAxXdT97d5r8x6FnEPswZ4ae411U/6OJKqwDDRApbCAlI
VxuEVzFAEQFth6hjnw5XeVDBOlC9FB7xHajtbQ/SHHKm9U5B7d3p1Mm9bPT6NKsE
Y671/jo8H46lxZ1QDc9laCWQ0HrKmNVmBCTiiQqWK1BH+LfX/ZSJ9uv3uPgLi94=
=yg+H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4tkssvp36SW1tyIS--