1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <marek@palatinus.cz>) id 1VZRBF-0002pa-SW
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:06:53 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mail-vb0-f48.google.com ([209.85.212.48])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VZRBF-0008Tk-0V
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:06:53 +0000
Received: by mail-vb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id w16so1604539vbf.7
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=QjW37/xxbjDXVEps0r2kpYT9cknc/Dl6ezBapFp+X1U=;
b=N5ooix6eQJDl3UOSm83QSlUCxzqTEvRduB8cV0F6wcc+GnP27aMIju0fz64PkLnbo3
0HjGxDpVeilthBuxu0wY0Glq2zwtzRrQG+Pa9i7FcNhPiIC6QMaadjfbKyYMcyQwSo7U
u/+HuPXJGPaRqnYTjGPrbY1ZyYPbxNDkNvBgYmWDAQgfrCkGkGWAwbHeU8JXkL21OAlx
KfqHrQc826YXNggUQVQAt3XeUV686g1EM8UKgI9NfymTvvHHALTHWX4KsybqoHBDSZbA
EwmRjrWykGexYava8TdkC1BaCC1c5q0RpPBvfazN3FtnA1GcAfsJii9qrxeWizF20txb
tC5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnK0oqWGvrs618sGthWqBZmRGwFSxnt9j1fKVXAyQaK1WdIk/udSwUj0dJPotvLMY05Vd0A
X-Received: by 10.221.21.133 with SMTP id qs5mr2231438vcb.28.1382643493107;
Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: marek@palatinus.cz
Received: by 10.59.1.2 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAC1+kJPTXOkLoo=QHt1xyNwJ4BkNu1kVOXcZX5gF1MCNMbNSpg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJna-HgXPNa2UCO_edBzK=oY5-F=6LQVHap1Vk9XtGr09chy9Q@mail.gmail.com>
<796AC330-56EF-43D2-9935-5409824A4F33@godofgod.co.uk>
<CAJna-HhKDx4xnwWCC7apTLCDwEurFbagNTYXF=doBbhDBaXojA@mail.gmail.com>
<0F445FFE-FA1A-4A64-9A28-C734E744B5F7@godofgod.co.uk>
<5231AF5E.8080903@gk2.sk>
<15F27A88-53BF-4149-A8FF-282350312B92@godofgod.co.uk>
<CAJna-HiE8YgKOuAHubRKbJYQviMz8Ws9E+eMDwcgV1pWpDBijg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAC1+kJPTXOkLoo=QHt1xyNwJ4BkNu1kVOXcZX5gF1MCNMbNSpg@mail.gmail.com>
From: slush <slush@centrum.cz>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 21:37:43 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: u0TmEyHj9VBhbYarJvcblvT8qeE
Message-ID: <CAJna-Hivko2uGTVWOAkgqCyc9D0LxqNviONpnQ32mPbk18cmyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= <jtimon@monetize.io>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113378dc42353704e981c64f
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(slush[at]centrum.cz)
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: monetize.io]
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-Headers-End: 1VZRBF-0008Tk-0V
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP0039 Mnemonic code for generating
deterministic keys
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:06:54 -0000
--001a113378dc42353704e981c64f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Jorge Tim=F3n <jtimon@monetize.io> wrote:
> This will probably sound stupid to most of you, but I'll say it anyway.
>
> The aim of mnemonics is to easily remember, isn't it?
>
Well, I would say more "retype" than "remember". I really don't think that
common user will memorize it. But of course, it is still an option.
> But the approach of removing "offensive words" is probably
> counterproductive to achieving that end. These words cause a greater
> emotional impact in our human moral psyches.
>
No, I dont' think it is stupid! Actually it was my concern as well.
Unfortunately I don't think it is "politically correct" to include all
bitches, assholes and motherfuckers in end user product :-).
> If we were willing to use that fact in our advantage to optimize the
> "maximum unforgettableness" criterion, we should actually prefer the
> most generally offensive words in that list. Specially if they can
> combine with each other to produce more offensive results, basically
> the opposite of what we're doing.
> Isn't "legalize murder dirty jew" much easier to remember for most
> people than "sandwich house yellow cauliflower"?
>
>
Well, bip39 can have more dictionaries and *maybe* swearword dictionary
would gain some popularity ;).
slush
--001a113378dc42353704e981c64f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Jorge Tim=F3n <span dir=
=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:jtimon@monetize.io" target=3D"_blank">jtimon=
@monetize.io</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote">
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">This will probably sound stupid to most of y=
ou, but I'll say it anyway.<br>
<br>
The aim of mnemonics is to easily remember, isn't it?<br></blockquote><=
div><br></div><div style>Well, I would say more "retype" than &qu=
ot;remember". I really don't think that common user will memorize =
it. But of course, it is still an option.</div>
<div style>=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0=
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
But the approach of removing "offensive words" is probably<br>
counterproductive to achieving that end. These words cause a greater<br>
emotional impact in our human moral psyches.<br></blockquote><div><br></div=
><div style>No, I dont' think it is stupid! Actually it was my concern =
as well. Unfortunately I don't think it is "politically correct&qu=
ot; to include all bitches, assholes and motherfuckers in end user product =
:-).</div>
<div style>=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0=
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
If we were willing to use that fact in our advantage to optimize the<br>
"maximum unforgettableness" criterion, we should actually prefer =
the<br>
most generally offensive words in that list. Specially if they can<br>
combine with each other to produce more offensive results, basically<br>
the opposite of what we're doing.=A0</blockquote><blockquote class=3D"g=
mail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-l=
eft:1ex">
<br>
Isn't "legalize murder dirty jew" much easier to remember for=
most<br>
people than "sandwich house yellow cauliflower"?<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Well, bip39 can have more dictio=
naries and *maybe* swearword dictionary would gain some popularity ;).</div=
><div style>=A0</div><div style>slush</div></div></div></div>
--001a113378dc42353704e981c64f--
|
