1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
|
Return-Path: <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 676FEC4E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 6 Aug 2019 02:54:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-40135.protonmail.ch (mail-40135.protonmail.ch
[185.70.40.135])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB795829
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 6 Aug 2019 02:54:22 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 02:54:14 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
s=default; t=1565060060;
bh=WiYH3qNPyVC+lZoDjWRRBp/3pejHQ2cr2Wx3M5Ffx7Y=;
h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:
Feedback-ID:From;
b=InsSTBXQZtgbQVqQmq6AQBhjZtns8CP3siCKB6V9tqmBqWuACd/TQQ5MKwAuUpvAd
GPImiLgNopT360Lt84RN/lDNyHS8/pTDRTYruCKj8H6yq4VygmpOcI32FvPiukC5cv
XN/JoLstyRFBCYn3g2xEoXNDVNfMqFI2KUWZLCNc=
To: Chris Belcher <belcher@riseup.net>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <vwdvU8vMocIk6rEm5jdlRa9G_0dsDyNjURYYxin6HcjDddDFv8IyOQcxNvnGn6ywFLVWkVb7VvP-qcboH1EX8f_t85sbyuCzT6DbXhj5if0=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ad501873-8912-765e-8df5-c9b0451fcd0a@riseup.net>
References: <985792b1-e7aa-677b-a7a1-6a5f672da884@riseup.net>
<94534006-D560-4C90-9D5D-A3A64B698518@gmail.com>
<20190726143738.0be561da@simplexum.com>
<3c328312-2bdd-60d9-7425-8db620d09abb@riseup.net>
<20190731205018.10ed4302@simplexum.com>
<ae32dcbb-c950-3b3f-22b9-d152d6b221cb@riseup.net>
<20190802145057.7b81c597@simplexum.com>
<ad501873-8912-765e-8df5-c9b0451fcd0a@riseup.net>
Feedback-ID: el4j0RWPRERue64lIQeq9Y2FP-mdB86tFqjmrJyEPR9VAtMovPEo9tvgA0CrTsSHJeeyPXqnoAu6DN-R04uJUg==:Ext:ProtonMail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 04:39:26 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Improving JoinMarket's resistance to sybil
attacks using fidelity bonds
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 02:54:23 -0000
Good morning Chris,
> This could be worked around by honest makers because they
> can consolidate TXOs on the blockchain, which rented TXO owners can't do
> because the TXOs are owned by different people.
Would it not be possible the below?
* I rent some funds from Dmitry.
I agree to pay him 0.5 BTC for this service of putting up 50BTC from Dmit=
ry UTXO.
* I also own 50BTC myself in a separate UTXO.
* We create a funding transaction paying out to a Schnorr MuSig output that=
is 2-of-2 between us.
This spends Dmitry UTXO 50 BTC and my UTXO 50BTC.
We only create this yet and do not sign.
* We create a backout transaction, probably with `nLockTime`, paying out 50=
.5BTC to Dmitry and 49.5BTC to me.
This spends the funding transaction.
We sign this using MuSig.
* After we exchange the signatures of the backout transaction, we exchange =
signatures for the funding transaction.
* Now we have a common 100BTC UTXO (indistinguishable from other Schnorr si=
ngle-sig UTXOs) that can be used as fidelity bond for me.
This is the output of the funding transaction.
The above can be scaled up so I can rent arbitrary amounts of coin from man=
y different people, who are assured of getting their funds back, in exchang=
e for a fidelity bond / advertisement, and thus greatly destroying the prop=
erties of the V^2 tweak.
(The ability to have shared ownership of UTXOs is a powerful feature of Bit=
coin, and backs its ability to scale, as witnessed with Lightning Network a=
nd channel factories.)
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj
|
