1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
|
Return-Path: <sickpig@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A053E77
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:13:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com (mail-lb0-f169.google.com
[209.85.217.169])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0FCE106
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:13:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u9so60368749lbp.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:13:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=RpGAOcwqCXwtrQjy2M6mDjeMhfkg9cNebHgIHpMANa8=;
b=xYTbNFoXdpEOD7mEOprgEeeA0UyJmNAeGe/xOsmi05RD1p7BJhmZiEGQrO9Kc9ofSE
ucY0xbHGlJ+DZ4tf3oMBhcUvtwyD+f8YEOdMDzbuGAm83hklzHsOs1IyK3CSGzCZhFtJ
MkON53adJWOUOoEnGRTXUIYy/CzoY32deJyllAgdi347C5R1WSji2XyTXXIVvdwXxjTL
pCmUEmEfeiNLinLwPwtIJGoBkXw2u4yAxF0u7KLacj1fAvlU1XArHGvcOEamlHkYKFK4
/5HJziukQJ614wD2bDGagIxjrcamUBKbt1zTLubXLvPDzGOU3CL/7g/fHZU2uAOdAvAf
6nyA==
X-Received: by 10.112.160.202 with SMTP id xm10mr821893lbb.22.1450433632816;
Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:13:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.89.139 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:13:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBjbATqf8DXGF7obw9a=371zQ_S0EgTapnUmukAVenTneQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADm_WcasDuBsop55ZWcTb2FvccaoREg8K032rUjgQUQhQ3g=XA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBi=Mw7UnxG1-0-0ZTRqxrS5+28VmowyYrGP2MAvYiu_pA@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_WcbrMyk-=OnQ-3UvnF_8brhn+X2NqRPbo5xUXsbcZpc0=Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBjbATqf8DXGF7obw9a=371zQ_S0EgTapnUmukAVenTneQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "sickpig@gmail.com" <sickpig@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:13:33 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+c4Zozac8=aMrAJ1N_6SR9eBD+w0e70cEnk9CG_2oZ72AS-8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c261ac74562905272965e0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:24:07 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Block size: It's economics & user preparation &
moral hazard
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:13:55 -0000
--001a11c261ac74562905272965e0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > - only assuming robust adoption rates by up-layer ecosystem software, and
>
> That's not required. Everyone who individually switches to new
> transactions gets to do 1.75x more transactions for the same price
> (and at the same time gets safer contracts, better script
> upgradability, and more security models at their disposal), completely
> independent of whether anyone else in the ecosystem does the same.
>
>
So hypothetically if wallets/payments processors/full nodes adoption
will take 6 month to get to 50% after the segwit soft-fork activation, this
means that actual network capacity will be increased by:
1.75 x 0.5 + 1 x 0.5 = 1.375
after six month.
An hard-fork on the others side would bring 1.75 since the activation, am I
right?
--001a11c261ac74562905272965e0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On F=
ri, Dec 18, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr=
"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_b=
lank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><block=
quote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc=
solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""><br>
> - only assuming robust adoption rates by up-layer ecosystem software, =
and<br>
<br>
</span>That's not required. Everyone who individually switches to new<b=
r>
transactions gets to do 1.75x more transactions for the same price<br>
(and at the same time gets safer contracts, better script<br>
upgradability, and more security models at their disposal), completely<br>
independent of whether anyone else in the ecosystem does the same.<br>
<span class=3D""><br></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>So hypothetica=
lly if wallets/payments processors/full nodes adoption <br></div><div>will =
take 6 month to get to 50% after the segwit soft-fork activation, this <br>=
</div><div>means that actual network capacity will be increased by: <br><br=
></div><div>1.75 x 0.5 + 1 x 0.5 =3D 1.375<br><br></div><div>after six mont=
h. <br><br></div><div>An hard-fork on the others side would bring 1.75 sinc=
e the activation, am I right? <br><br><br></div><div><br><br></div><div><br=
></div></div><br></div></div>
--001a11c261ac74562905272965e0--
|
