summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/25/923bc2d9f6dda6ab43f8c5c8ea6c1d096408cc
blob: 92a664a072653597d464ac45b89a0e60da58f3e8 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
Return-Path: <john@johnnewbery.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F72C000B
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4733484369
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
 header.d=johnnewbery-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id j_g4GIGcvukh
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:49:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27D4684333
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:49:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u25so16449077ljg.7
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=johnnewbery-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=CIT9T41GvQKJl1VhYmSIR+u9WvZZxexEvRsw5fg2dUg=;
 b=Mrs8v4NExJfDeawfZIc6Of79/LcOPI1SHmHgZBtriFNyUL1cQNgfQr7ak+q+AbZ7TG
 XMtj+Qblei56oVuvXLT+XV5ScV3tLG64AuPYaoGQVdn4Qi61/8UCX915PRy2Ar0Y40b8
 qpm8lbSCLKhvM+HTeMxgGCI9yyUswEX5s3VtXzHq++YwyN972AQjPhcFjxjL9S/mVyN8
 8ypHKLWR+kF9NXacAmZJwWuuEJY+vj6r2hPU3XsyJ2A2+S7HtHFNZh1Gq8QTAehmhQkb
 FRw6qNe/tU1ilQFWfOs983CSNwWhchjpFBFkbftXvgpHmZEFFzuybD0z/ICwqC+X5f0x
 H6bQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=CIT9T41GvQKJl1VhYmSIR+u9WvZZxexEvRsw5fg2dUg=;
 b=I3UwAnnubYsHkXdAAkstXLr4NRiKH+z8Rlszd5LpBpAcL7aDx9AtLBuXkpiXI2zT09
 NGEhNE/h3MBb/7ukLMCWjxC8H4SM4zCcqYvAFjDQKenYokpa5/t4ybWAJz6EeZzpjI6b
 cFenicx1ch+66NW3+mJXH3x2VejTHBtOn50AzTrTKWV2SRQMS1+SIpTEsvBeeR0Uj8Of
 aWGoFQv++xKL3MwbbpghNkHCgNAwGFHMdDEcz5JJNcgLaJujAbeye3rAuQ4By1DoHxZJ
 d0CJcLADaemFmUYdn4t96eahPB7u3UYrTPVQ3kLL+JRj6+u3Ph0pVD0Nk5AFkX+u4kpF
 +HtA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+e5bDJT67nW0dJiiqeSaUPgNCpaN0VUcqFAnJu3i9rCoe7x1n
 aaElqWBaUFqep1QIEKO9Rcvw3qUMPTPb4BKH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFwF2RLnBMxf0CRJY1P6pRAnl9XU+KyUZqieac3S7gVo+AsxZz1z/wPhL8+gzpFf/rQM5nSw==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:bc0c:: with SMTP id b12mr1902512ljf.502.1619164191108; 
 Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-f50.google.com (mail-lf1-f50.google.com.
 [209.85.167.50])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p18sm473554lfu.52.2021.04.23.00.49.50
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-f50.google.com with SMTP id x19so45768985lfa.2
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3ed:: with SMTP id
 n13mr1801384lfq.439.1619164190457; 
 Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <202104230209.05373.luke@dashjr.org>
 <CAD5xwhgy1dkKqbWY=n1_p5MfbNwJweCHZotkD6hj7K4kv+wg3Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5xwhgy1dkKqbWY=n1_p5MfbNwJweCHZotkD6hj7K4kv+wg3Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:49:39 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAFmfg2viPZ+_be0jPD_JQ=S1Mo6qc4E4zc26sEiudVFKcL6qCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAFmfg2viPZ+_be0jPD_JQ=S1Mo6qc4E4zc26sEiudVFKcL6qCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000067c55105c09f0ad7"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:43:40 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:49:55 -0000

--00000000000067c55105c09f0ad7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

ACK adding Kalle.

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 4:36 AM Jeremy via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> ACK adding Kalle.
>
> Kalle is a qualified reviewer / editor and well suited for this role.
> --
> @JeremyRubin <https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin>
> <https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 7:09 PM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to
>> assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo.
>>
>> Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP editors, IMO it should
>> be
>> fine to use BIP 2's Process BIP progression:
>>
>> > A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active when it achieves
>> > rough consensus on the mailing list. Such a proposal is said to have
>> > rough consensus if it has been open to discussion on the development
>> > mailing list for at least one month, and no person maintains any
>> > unaddressed substantiated objections to it.
>>
>> A Process BIP could be opened for each new editor, but IMO that is
>> unnecessary. If anyone feels there is a need for a new Process BIP, we
>> can go
>> that route, but there is prior precedent for BIP editors appointing new
>> BIP
>> editors, so I think this should be fine.
>>
>> Please speak up soon if you disagree.
>>
>> Luke
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

--00000000000067c55105c09f0ad7
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><span style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:arial,helvetic=
a,sans-serif">ACK adding Kalle.</span><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 4:36 AM J=
eremy via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundati=
on.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><bloc=
kquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:=
1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D=
"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:s=
mall;color:rgb(0,0,0)">ACK adding Kalle.</div><div class=3D"gmail_default" =
style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0=
,0,0)"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:arial,he=
lvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:rgb(0,0,0)">Kalle is a qualified r=
eviewer / editor and well suited for this role.<br clear=3D"all"></div><div=
><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">--<br><a href=3D"https://twitter.com/Jer=
emyRubin" target=3D"_blank">@JeremyRubin</a><a href=3D"https://twitter.com/=
JeremyRubin" target=3D"_blank"></a></div></div></div><br></div><br><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Thu, Apr 22, 20=
21 at 7:09 PM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev=
@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfounda=
tion.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D=
"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-le=
ft:1ex">Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP edi=
tor to <br>
assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo.<br>
<br>
Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP editors, IMO it should be =
<br>
fine to use BIP 2&#39;s Process BIP progression:<br>
<br>
&gt; A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active when it achieves<=
br>
&gt; rough consensus on the mailing list. Such a proposal is said to have<b=
r>
&gt; rough consensus if it has been open to discussion on the development<b=
r>
&gt; mailing list for at least one month, and no person maintains any<br>
&gt; unaddressed substantiated objections to it.<br>
<br>
A Process BIP could be opened for each new editor, but IMO that is <br>
unnecessary. If anyone feels there is a need for a new Process BIP, we can =
go <br>
that route, but there is prior precedent for BIP editors appointing new BIP=
 <br>
editors, so I think this should be fine.<br>
<br>
Please speak up soon if you disagree.<br>
<br>
Luke<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>

--00000000000067c55105c09f0ad7--