blob: 49c00a5c43a1a8652b4846cbada0eb30d6e0c85c (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
|
Return-Path: <thomasv@electrum.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BCE540F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 3 Sep 2017 05:22:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from slow1-d.mail.gandi.net (slow1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.86])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2DFA1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 3 Sep 2017 05:22:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net
[217.70.183.196])
by slow1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BAD747E73B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 3 Sep 2017 07:19:16 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 77.179.26.31
Received: from [192.168.1.26] (x4db31a1f.dyn.telefonica.de [77.179.26.31])
(Authenticated sender: thomasv@electrum.org)
by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6410D172095
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 3 Sep 2017 07:19:13 +0200 (CEST)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CABuOfuijNyNrdSfCXKySw0Qf7E1db8sgzWYgW9uOg_ZJJbuixA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv@electrum.org>
Message-ID: <5a27e555-173e-b5a7-8c05-5ee32e885ee2@electrum.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 07:19:12 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABuOfuijNyNrdSfCXKySw0Qf7E1db8sgzWYgW9uOg_ZJJbuixA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP49 Derivation scheme changes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 05:22:23 -0000
On 30.08.2017 09:24, shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
> 2. Segwit wallet seed words have a different format which is incompatible
> with previous wallet seed words. This encodes the information that this
> wallet is segwit in the seed words itself. We need to define a structure
> for this
>
That is what Electrum does.
See http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/seedphrase.html
|
