1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
|
Return-Path: <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6461C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 16 May 2022 00:00:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AB840951
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 16 May 2022 00:00:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Gtt040apvatk
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 16 May 2022 00:00:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-40138.protonmail.ch (mail-40138.protonmail.ch
[185.70.40.138])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE05A4094C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 16 May 2022 00:00:27 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 00:00:16 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
s=protonmail2; t=1652659225; x=1652918425;
bh=bjMtfCD3C0EjL+WnSlrqAokimtWy9WyV9IZz1GdoD5Y=;
h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:
References:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:
Feedback-ID:Message-ID;
b=H8yPOqVqDgkR6H1nyHR/zHibwD4trxKDoDRPYDEDEh8FCxKqpqdari1zv6bd4xPPe
HIZB2X31J+roMqmLYl0xDV6cABkCRxE4JYm331cwckaoPJaBx279ks5J9n9bmQjOFN
Ks0SGiPnqMC9JYayoeilJrTdy7aCmmalf5Uje0gSa76s92vVG0ON4P7Sr62dqYEB8t
eVZ3i/wauoQMEuQuHwF7a2K9uMIsY6MnVuQ+j5Ehpf5UMnl1wA6s1dbHztfA2T3MFE
RmFAcsNTe3pVwekRJkax7K1W0WwJx+UPTQU4SHXuhurFF1pqSKYO63tKL8ZsSP7h8Y
EHSMChk4uuW9Q==
To: Chris Belcher <belcher@riseup.net>
From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <SWV1PDHijAF6FwWeobGDCqhvmd8Na8sZZ7Bdfq66g1UCBSNJCBWVFLG0NKfND01wd1gE7ZXjWirJZ3QBOm056o1iDkevl5GYz_sazwWIAGY=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f4dc955f-4cae-bc4f-7d85-ec2ae1fcf546@riseup.net>
References: <22c80504-e648-e021-866e-ca5a5db3b247@riseup.net>
<bsOJ-OnnA4FutVmPqtg1xY-k0notwX4OqqIpdMsymXR9-KnS2iXGUE8o7kDVeYBMCqAX0v3oEAmiVMhUIB25gupx6l_bLff2_CNsLK_sk-U=@protonmail.com>
<82948428-29a3-e50a-a54a-520a83f39bba@riseup.net>
<dI-CkifjUyQssT-JzKmv09W6NggL89orF78qz1AOFlBL7Kmxo6z5BVBEr6aZha_nbnBQHFcN1hqC5EZM7lB0U0jiBtE3ZWCiIR_dGBJMsDA=@protonmail.com>
<Xjq4gzy3me86tG6sYumDq16JE8EpRSnC90Ao-02Fyz3i55vRlLY7QKbW9TdaSJg8hiclxpBqhW93CtNgeCzVmbN3CDaW35P3BZwYp1o54H0=@protonmail.com>
<6IPqvNW2vQcHQLhUgSmQQLqtnV0RGrsUfnoUMKgv0SDQpVvKh7PIqJOKNazzgEzGE2W5OHHrlEtmg9lapjbiSjTpUuxqPmsiFua2P_ZN_FY=@protonmail.com>
<PFBgbTn4_7JXQaRMlMjZDVrGBIr4OKfMK1ftW38cY-8Qu6tm_GllxDOWEj7K4zHkmQz9jA9NO_9rT_UzTSw9rr3RneEKTNhz826LmEIWF7w=@protonmail.com>
<05fdc268-1701-cd62-181d-906b6b5d4f9d@riseup.net>
<FiQ49v3gOISKrdhs08_rsoYj9pwwcLRvwXbXPgGV3ulDGW70Wsfk3AMAX1KpOByW3iTm_aQdi6tECdMmDcycl1qIM2KNlJz4DiHZ8omhT8U=@protonmail.com>
<f4dc955f-4cae-bc4f-7d85-ec2ae1fcf546@riseup.net>
Feedback-ID: 2872618:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Timelocked address fidelity bond
for BIP39 seeds
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 00:00:28 -0000
Good morning Chris,
> Yes linking the two identities (joinmarket maker and teleport maker)
> together slightly degrades privacy, but that has to be balanced against
> the privacy loss of leaving both systems open to sybil attacks. Without
> fidelity bonds the two systems can be sybil attacked just by using about
> five-figures USD, and the attack can get these coins back at any time
> when they're finished.
I am not saying "do not use fidelity bonds at all", I am saying "maybe we s=
hould disallow a fidelity bond used in JoinMarket from being used in Telepo=
rt and vice versa".
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj
|
