summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/23/a5d5e1b064a444aba154d6a135f6821bf9fb15
blob: 26c65ba4a5ecc189f19ad78ded3604840e93e862 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <john.dillon892@googlemail.com>) id 1UsVyw-0008WU-Ff
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:32:46 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of googlemail.com
	designates 209.85.215.178 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.215.178;
	envelope-from=john.dillon892@googlemail.com;
	helo=mail-ea0-f178.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ea0-f178.google.com ([209.85.215.178])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1UsVyu-0006mt-Jr
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:32:46 +0000
Received: by mail-ea0-f178.google.com with SMTP id l15so940326eak.37
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri, 28 Jun 2013 03:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.220.66 with SMTP id n42mr13032663eep.67.1372415558301;
	Fri, 28 Jun 2013 03:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.12.131 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 03:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP07LOEDK7wV3afJJN9cEw8xQHoqA=Jk_GrQs2jrpCBC7w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1372353053.10405.140661249237317.77984E1F@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<CAAS2fgTka6Dw94V0-vHBHxG=zadu9EmhKmfVm7Y_dQUUgrTf6w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP2gv2qus1CKTTSFMYcNQDbrSctKmA03YE_eZFDTQsQhXw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPaL=UV6vhVK6W0FiVoqM+=9C9TAUXVKwbuynq3NZYFzFR8TTQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP07LOEDK7wV3afJJN9cEw8xQHoqA=Jk_GrQs2jrpCBC7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:32:38 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPaL=UXD==EdqcjAQiR+jQMOJYJ7AqB9m8OyDzTwgqScTf33Hg@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Dillon <john.dillon892@googlemail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(john.dillon892[at]googlemail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
	digit (john.dillon892[at]googlemail.com)
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1UsVyu-0006mt-Jr
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: MultiBit as default desktop
 client on bitcoin.org
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:32:46 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
> I suspect what you saw is mining nodes restarting and clearing their
> mempools out rather than an explicit policy of replace by fee.

Possibly, but it is a rather short window of opportunity and the mining node
would have to be connected directly, to Peter's replace-by-fee node. I also
took care to ensure transactions were only ever broadcast once. (I disabled the
wallet rebroadcast mechanism)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRzWYWAAoJEEWCsU4mNhiP3fIIAJLFxMnjI4BGRrNLsxs0hXp0
zDCgiZ6UnZa5JRcd/6KjV3hnPHwweGEjChGfrzY/Fxo4Pga1lQFlp8E8PaFUJq50
r6LTNJQLW50r5mFkZ6Mkh877WwX/OHBzkp8SqbbD7+dDBV7R9LqLYqLTHgObKxg1
V9UjGRJiMohW8HLdOzEXOz1ugoBCjR+vyQW5ZD2nZVcQlIhxSIgeC/M46oxMN7pE
Y5EepCQehNPuc1On7TtJ9LlmFJ6Dvsl6dqwKNWMi1lgBTiw7abdTJne2B/KeDyom
vhGuhmpMLGKKgJns3hne3yQM+Ivi3jLIHKejcoCm1JkSCdjw48XkyGd0V359M3w=
=qyyq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----