summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/22/e34c5ba3004d70910853055d78c15779711dd8
blob: bf154e4ded7399dffc066762c6fb206fe4a0d1f5 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
Return-Path: <alp.bitcoin@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 221A3B59
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:24:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pg0-f45.google.com (mail-pg0-f45.google.com [74.125.83.45])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CE64226
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:24:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id 141so26741354pgd.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; 
	bh=UNIrTQZDQ6i1KOKMkx2OrZTgshQMkwzikhfuUpDkxng=;
	b=hLh1BXSHj4lr1nsXv2UCy0xFiq1ezKvU77szdJAbeAxfYbDoKBdRqpB7keT8wGtRxJ
	NWCyrPZiycck85+Yukvybjr2IYrn+R0Hd+8BK13rqd7SQi+C11wEc54DUCEJnBDrx8k8
	xwNBDtAYWKvhCfZa/bvTQC0r7fkaTXl3rKyLV1vtHNUi9FRLTY0H7YQ1LogZ3GfFwkwS
	A/4/jcnFhXy5b+KD+7Hfji7i0srbiR99wktdiNpKKr5YBaxg8fuHyPZDQB/2xTEyCRrw
	tE1+dx8IVyhob7AnmnGCfGc4y7xr7qEQKhNWhnn6OsH4c4ROUXPXkWeVOc5/aB2heb1n
	HgVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=UNIrTQZDQ6i1KOKMkx2OrZTgshQMkwzikhfuUpDkxng=;
	b=sW1dTC1+TpqD6jBNwEC9kqfuerRrHIp4vvcLVlW1lQNRfYJwGAf0SgtL3lD59CedKi
	pOcGINIrXUpJP+ufTbSpVnCeeU8Xq8+okX7xaHldTsjbY5cxO60NYkEAtrYkUtITLfJb
	lkpc/Rp7lhLH8ZK1jYzhUhN4ZrRov/FXPThEBXFAw3QluXw8YmgAhkeyQDY9ioXk6Fy+
	wEAjvYvoL84I7lJ9PSJ9s9SzsgNGUp1anurO0WDGqD3GJc7tklWH5yu2SMk9e0UfL2rw
	CeMrjaDYy32uNj/2CfH34ItMBBEffqhyuNU9mpm5u4Kidk7G41yJ/LDBGF72P1wO3VF0
	Mlpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H13TxdKOH4tAdPx6iNkcgp3qtzXa1i13iaI3RJ1s55/IL/wnaQtmjZpettJxa8TUHyK0rAwNSJdqdq/zg==
X-Received: by 10.98.198.78 with SMTP id m75mr11064352pfg.160.1489677854841;
	Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.170.76 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJowKg+GGsvPAR1ywDody=GGQnEh5pwUMW48cLOmUGhU8SdDtA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJowKg+GGsvPAR1ywDody=GGQnEh5pwUMW48cLOmUGhU8SdDtA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alphonse Pace <alp.bitcoin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:24:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMBsKS87Cu+NtWTuOgeA7hmgTpW9Et-uHdpYkofNV0a73fM+8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>, 
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0a2b3e5e2955054adaa70a
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Quadratic hashing solution for a post-segwit hard
	fork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:24:16 -0000

--94eb2c0a2b3e5e2955054adaa70a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This unnecessarily complicates transaction selection for miners by
introducing a second (and possibly third if I understand your proposal
correctly) dimension to try to optimize.

See:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_packing_problem

Segwit already solves this exact issue by replacing block size with block
weight, so I fail to see how this proposal would make any improvements
without introducing significant complications.



=E2=80=8B

--94eb2c0a2b3e5e2955054adaa70a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>This unnecessarily complicates transaction selection =
for miners by introducing a second (and possibly third if I understand your=
 proposal correctly) dimension to try to optimize.</div><div><br></div><div=
>See: =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_packing_problem">h=
ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_packing_problem</a><br></div><div><br></di=
v><div>Segwit already solves this exact issue by replacing block size with =
block weight, so I fail to see how this proposal would make any improvement=
s without introducing significant complications.</div><div><br></div><div><=
br></div><div><br></div>=E2=80=8B</div>

--94eb2c0a2b3e5e2955054adaa70a--