1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
|
Return-Path: <mark@friedenbach.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B49BBCB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:22:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-it0-f50.google.com (mail-it0-f50.google.com
[209.85.214.50])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B4D9A3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:22:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-it0-f50.google.com with SMTP id m47so18627576iti.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=friedenbach-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=l0HutJzE7OuNAGPp5HoxVmP/JnmgBSQjU6sVWEgPf3w=;
b=WHOmOYVvaxzPFDDiZnIFnlvkUfcjCgXrR0AEvAyTqMC+2/Q1f70YmwwsgBTNQZmTzk
hsJlzOAFiTEs3g67hRPQdcWaNWwguJj7a12PjwrjpWiq+hO2i2dEVrx/ohq3fvJJwW1O
tU0ratB7lazHEg1E1QAenyCIoi3okalvD5YtM6PCYH58S4OjYhWBMSYxHg8pM1R0FB08
tjCHlOkE4TDawjCDBVDynZMy6no2WQUFmL82TrfNHIeONQ2jB30WJUa1VvBpd3zRTqr9
SjYtGpUzzZN7Hg3QfdonPvfb6Rpaq04nWXZwOmGA4kQCNknxMSHAXYgofcOgtYML8+k/
SmjA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=l0HutJzE7OuNAGPp5HoxVmP/JnmgBSQjU6sVWEgPf3w=;
b=OebHbaPYadj6W4egGM6Rh6A0dPkO1fNUAm4ubaYrjtwbh5O2a1xE40qAWDl8Dkv4vB
5dqWZLgLSqxnxWZn2VE0fUeC1DBguaS+9p1Y4QCOh7/iqRqPiGefXLGFmagdcWpbFSfu
vjTX5xd9uXOMDM6r0MrT3nspipk2xB4nVL2LCwpU4WxH+XORs25bOJupK7uQAsjweJVJ
YBOgjOmFcKtP+/yTBuY0qSTUh0+70Exv0Rtu7Wl9kPkj2wkGS3mbjr0s7SFNlEoDy+dp
s+zePzAUKxXyqpHfE+SOb8jc6rO3eNZiVFugqtQTSUlrY9EpntWL8rOl+jJlUk7tbhSX
nGbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzJ5r15gLPP9RFOeinSJvbDPiLpPrtQof7hwTljDqo2KEa9qvQn
83Ljsb2Qaxenoz/KwiYpWkbCB7kCUMEq
X-Received: by 10.36.194.129 with SMTP id i123mr4549935itg.9.1497979358761;
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.137.165 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [173.228.107.141]
In-Reply-To: <CAFMkqK_OtZ=S5LFqERCYwSQCkbxdnWJq+wN-YM3CVkKWJx2SBA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJowKgLtu-HUDuakk4DDU53nyChbQk_zY=f5OO2j1Za95PdL7w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFMkqK_OtZ=S5LFqERCYwSQCkbxdnWJq+wN-YM3CVkKWJx2SBA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:22:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOG=w-tp5w9Jr40v0ZmY26BPwG2Q0vycBtLj7pZ_qg67vVO3-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Hampus_Sj=C3=B6berg?= <hampus.sjoberg@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:26:02 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Miners forced to run non-core code in order to
get segwit activated
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:22:42 -0000
I think it is very na=C3=AFve to assume that any shift would be temporary.
We have a hard enough time getting miners to proactively upgrade to
recent versions of the reference bitcoin daemon. If miners interpret
the situation as being forced to run non-reference software in order
to prevent a chain split because a lack of support from Bitcoin Core,
that could be a one-way street.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Hampus Sj=C3=B6berg via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I don't think it's a huge deal if the miners need to run a non-Core node
> once the BIP91 deployment of Segwit2x happens. The shift will most likely=
be
> temporary.
>
> I agree that the "-bip148"-option should be merged, though.
>
> 2017-06-20 17:44 GMT+02:00 Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>:
>>
>> Are we going to merge BIP91 or a -BIP148 option to core for inclusion in
>> the next release or so?
>>
>> Because a large percentage of miners are indifferent, right now miners
>> have to choose between BIP148 and Segwit2x if they want to activate Segw=
it.
>>
>> Should we be forcing miners to choose to run non-core code in order to
>> activate a popular feature?
>>
>> - Erik
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
|
