1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
|
Return-Path: <nxtchg@hush.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9050C14DC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:57:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (smtp2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.134])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BC27F5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:57:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CF53EA0296
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:57:58 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=hush.com;
h=date:to:subject:from; s=hush;
bh=Ti7hkMu49p08JwGkodkNfNRwTLmt3Pa/vq1qIBPtNs4=;
b=a+mE6ejNEuL/4TlYzYaRgmAfx1nYLQ2mjy/ZygQGSMzb8br6IKdsVji0kXmBz9z1Ls5O3KTr9TMKEf0VTrY9BQ/+goBjaUOcPTSZKFwJNEdvZwPEirrEmuayiPhrqWXNmPhhYSW2WSbg4RJKQDM9ZYXD/ODVFlVy7Fty7ImsPQb4uGR10RciHF2ibnQ67ha/lM8mfV048uRnX60MDTZ/Sft6mzsn897cYgNujJ9Rpd8ysdunPJbd4m5cZTlaOYQER7RP6b38SKtGwUtFCCG9o+oJxngWxcz7G7QOsD4A7ji2v83gXzSYxTSzHtQzNFgsN7i+I77iIyLZEip5orxLGg==
Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w7.hushmail.com [65.39.178.32])
by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:57:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99)
id 820CC404B9; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:57:58 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 10:57:58 +0300
To: "Eric Voskuil" <eric@voskuil.org>, "Peter Todd" <pete@petertodd.org>,
"Matt Corallo" <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
From: "NxtChg" <nxtchg@hush.com>
In-Reply-To: <55FD1122.5030107@voskuil.org>
References: <CADm_WcaLKqhR=WcJ5B52Q9SAAa+AdZY6Kz5OCQVUc_RQm6e9gg@mail.gmail.com>
<55F9E47D.50507@mattcorallo.com>
<CAOG=w-t2ZYQbx8+mG5FX8vzgAC_tb8A6KMABmudHQbrquEqX-Q@mail.gmail.com>
<55FC6EBF.9090504@mattcorallo.com> <20150919014710.GD22598@muck>
<20150919060639.A775A404B9@smtp.hushmail.com>
<55FD0737.1080008@voskuil.org>
<20150919072714.D3349404B9@smtp.hushmail.com>
<55FD1122.5030107@voskuil.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20150919075758.820CC404B9@smtp.hushmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Libbitcoin <libbitcoin@lists.dyne.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Scaling Bitcoin conference micro-report
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:57:59 -0000
>Your vision of censorship resistance is to become such a strong
>central authority that you can resist it in direct physical confrontation.
>If you succeed at this, you are the threat.
My vision is a strong _decentralized_ system, which is:
a) too important to close,
b) able to provide adequate response to governments, like EFF or Google do.
Having a substantial attack surface and, at the same time, not having significant power is the worst fighting strategy.
It's the "Peter Todd vs 10 cops" scenario.
>The inability to see another option is the inability to understand what Satoshi created.
So your closing remark is basically, "you're too stupid to understand"?
I'll take it.
|
