1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
|
Return-Path: <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8AE7BDA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:10:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com (mail-oi0-f41.google.com
[209.85.218.41])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65E66179
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:10:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b187so101073757oif.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=oWivkmkEjoCaQH2XR1zHR0aY98A2+4blTncvB5TXIdg=;
b=BbnlWrpqhNNN/HsPk1kFLecO8YMYAn878LBi1KVlKJRJDxpdDvT6PH//iUaHccvh1B
JyszT5qwGvmWGH70vQW/v1RnUPkGy43sV0ExgJ09vNU5dTtOY7t3h5/FrzGJKIgeQnt6
9JWzE9RexG2hA6UdcneLG5H/oU0Hz5+3IJLDKtZSlctKOIjIt6GRuvE+kou+hiJN+RBm
ZVHjPZGcutOhY14SG9jhUx6NRWltz1AaTM7w/8a82gBw93MEx8C7tqePEwPYuoVEgXvo
S/n4bHGJb3jQUn6+mGGuBM6sJI2NVC3j5EzN9HVAmg61W0LmGwTBCHV//IuAg2tAOGhW
NM1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=oWivkmkEjoCaQH2XR1zHR0aY98A2+4blTncvB5TXIdg=;
b=X9CI7vgGFeh+Nt3PYx/4iiT5YtoJ2kJ4lwSGBUehxG5BApSUtS5W6X6lNtKtkISK71
qARGFTBu3ljxuXqjMQQbsX12FYXQdEJKb/TvT0hL3JqKvh98reLS8LlryjcTky6BEpP0
ukHtDEIQOT9sUBVdwTQ2cjgiI4+TPD8+Q8rpF0CJG7kuqJQaRfvkeSx9KX7P2A7JXDvf
RNGGh5otZ2ajad7U5/zperW8MPc+aOWT1T8p2D1yq5wYSnQFOw0ZWSXoitFDkN6FwRj2
yCSEU6ujcxhjJfgYvePK6PyDDAV1ViQ1fboRLy1aDvGgUJDSgy8b/+XMFISgPH9atbBa
p6KQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5Hc9sVdlCWBR7UNzIRKLWPa79ysTXsrAFxqMRG8V7jmEumvI+X
xacJlOhFtkmtRAuzTAtYxsKgXkDafA==
X-Received: by 10.202.253.81 with SMTP id b78mr6169638oii.101.1492204246745;
Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.116.74 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2003939.Nx7GrYTPuJ@cherry>
References: <CAAS2fgRdSOu8N6L3+fBpnye+rM+W6+F=cePy=9oL4tJuCj=Jsw@mail.gmail.com>
<2983024.JOGDlViq2a@cherry>
<CADvTj4qjCvN_kPV8YBz0f94YD2Ur4PWqryFPeKQ42fx_Wj2hTQ@mail.gmail.com>
<2003939.Nx7GrYTPuJ@cherry>
From: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:10:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CADvTj4rpGTJ59bg0JF2qOo8+f+jku=5zFZWX=uJ-eMhHjqhMcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Zander <tomz@freedommail.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] I do not support the BIP 148 UASF
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:10:48 -0000
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Friday, 14 April 2017 22:51:04 CEST James Hilliard wrote:
>> This doesn't remove the need for consensus rule enforcement of course.
>
> Thanks for confirming my point.
>
> This means that Gregory was incorrect saying that there is no risk to a non-
> upgraded node on a SegWit network mining a new invalid block. That risk is
> most definitely there for any miners "left behind" operating on a different
> set of consensus rules than the majority.
Greg is correct. There is effectively no risk to a non-upgrade
accidentally mining a new invalid block itself, the only risk is that
a non-upgraded miner could itself mine on top of an invalid block. You
would have to intentionally modify the code to mine an invalid block
which is not something that would be likely to happen accidentally.
>
> Kind of obvious, when you think about it.
>
> --
> Tom Zander
> Blog: https://zander.github.io
> Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
