summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/1f/578b501b59df584f89078ef7f864078b96a7c7
blob: d42d9baa353d35ab1f41f14a49cceff439b01d53 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5B9A84
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:43:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yk0-f177.google.com (mail-yk0-f177.google.com
	[209.85.160.177])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF55C187
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:43:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ykba77 with SMTP id a77so240820945ykb.2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:43:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=jtimon_cc.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=4oCdO+uvwkUkGNydmHupChZkJDzTsOncYUVQSdk63hQ=;
	b=giJsy5mkAWOU0H6Hd4UKVqzD0om0pIWRQUZzCG5e77c7lMxfMMj0jsxr8mz0x9OC3g
	gjqZDOZoWZsvABlr7JPVTsWo9CyleJQgKKNYYV/1SE4ldpphTGoS4l8QGH0OuyNEAk7D
	NgvSzE63gUpJ3jy0lvkLrtaaZwFJNZJmhzxRkdI65n0fCi3pAeoYjz3ll8T3tC6TjTb0
	oP89cXYKyPu4OW/IVtSlYhKKoQ/sAwkjz3nR7fJfSvyQa3JLI/gKhM052N2Jvka1+G79
	4kAz2yOoK7mxsHuVxT7khqFozQkgdkQkHmY2yeI2mNsp7Vzh1RfFX/vt5Z+TsGJel9AX
	iJQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=4oCdO+uvwkUkGNydmHupChZkJDzTsOncYUVQSdk63hQ=;
	b=hMdZDPo00R45pZJfXSEgUmmcqp6rI1HjwMlv6HiDIUOarXIMUrfO0p/A2ne6Z1BHAo
	8NMjA2OibqFagq/BjUzCrIH9wlcfhi2XpUqKxhs6jNog5+4vMKJaX2iDAmFT/rlh+qS1
	Nns+N1bWVzBlUM3P78ccyV4hGiQpr8ZDtBS+BtlSgaIqIWjYfhqIKxqJKlaOA2XZ9uQ7
	iW6V39kcBNnLDdVooZM68pJjbTBdHEdJ5t1XCh3tnnVOZGT7efZa6bxSafn1+fKZkqVG
	NfeuWNM3SohJ1h//4wh11LzV5hb3bhI/CfiPIE4+3U2T6gPxUe752t957M5FM1/PvMOm
	nc3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnSUvM3peGab65Gj6Ac+cpgt5EHJn/eWxyDZOgHTVsB9zwHva8mgyICmtotTtDmUrV82UQG
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.135.194 with SMTP id x185mr35864139ywf.25.1447685024916; 
	Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:43:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.31.132.147 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:43:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAE0pACLyuaU=gJji1DkC1xkpmRjCFdRReLHa8zsD04+aDDQLeA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE0pACLMcMzHkA=vEx+fiEmq7FA1bXDc4t_hQ+955=r=62V5=g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE0pACLzGPHs7-KG+fzbYJzbDZ+qxkoko_uPz4Kc-1ov8jdMsA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDrutCDFAVbXAFUaAZfoHK_sKzX6ZsMpD0j=f7HJj99Zpg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE0pACLyuaU=gJji1DkC1xkpmRjCFdRReLHa8zsD04+aDDQLeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 15:43:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CABm2gDrz7iEoA6bMsFc-U4VNCKepSZ44tiT3_WfUPS=MR2eOmw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Marco Pontello <marcopon@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:50:46 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RFC - BIP: URI scheme for Blockchain exploration
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:43:47 -0000

Not a native english speaker myself, so I may have missed some things...

Yes, sorry about the link. I guess you can point to #6230 . I can
rebase it if needed but I would close it again because I don't want to
have too many things from #6382 opened at the same time (is noisy and
worse for review). My plan was to not open it independently at least
until after #6907 (and actually after 0.12 assuming #6907 gets in by
0.12). But then I would maybe open a new one and reference the old one
rather than reopening #6230 (which tends to be confusing).
I'm not really sure what's the best answer here...but #6382 is
certainly going to need rebase and the link will be broken again.
Maybe one answer is to copy some text from #6230 or the commit and add
it directly to the BIP instead of referencing to that commit (which
will be, at least until #6907 is merged, a moving target).

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Marco Pontello <marcopon@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the comments! Now I fixed the typos (hope to have got them all=
,
> English isn't my first language), clarified the chain part a bit, and fix=
ed
> the link. There probably is a better way to reference that source code pa=
rt
> with the genesis blocks hashs, in a way that doesn't need to be changed,
> maybe...
>
> Now the main change would be to put in a proper BIP number! :)
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wro=
te:
>>
>> Thank you for incorporating the feedback, specifically thank you for
>> using the genesis block hash as the unique chain ID.
>>
>> I wen't through the BIP draft and left a few of comments, but I really
>> like its simplicity and focus. Good work!
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Marco Pontello via bitcoin-dev
>> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > To anyone that followed the discussion (from some time ago) about the
>> > proposed new URI for Blockchain references / exploration, I just wante=
d
>> > to
>> > point out that I have collected the feedback provided, reworked the
>> > text,
>> > put the BIP on GitHub and created a pull request:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/MarcoPon/bips/blob/master/bip-MarcoPon-01.mediawiki
>> > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/202
>> >
>> > The need for an URI for this come to mind again in the last days looki=
ng
>> > at
>> > Eternity Wall, which IMHO provide a use case that we will see more and
>> > more
>> > in the (near) future: http://eternitywall.it/
>> > Using that service, when you want to check for the proof that a specif=
ic
>> > message was written in the Blockchain, it let you choose from 5
>> > different
>> > explorer.
>> > Mycelium wallet recently added the option to select one of 15 block
>> > explorers.
>> > And there's the crypto_bot on reddit/r/bitcoin that detect reference t=
o
>> > transaction an add a message with links to 7 different explorers.
>> >
>> > I think that's clearly something that's needed.
>> >
>> > Bye!
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Marco Pontello <marcopon@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi!
>> >> My first post here, hope I'm following the right conventions.
>> >> I had this humble idea for a while, so I thought to go ahead and
>> >> propose
>> >> it.
>> >>
>> >> BIP: XX
>> >> Title: URI scheme for Blockchain exploration
>> >> Author: Marco Pontello
>> >> Status: Draft
>> >> Type: Standards Track
>> >> Created: 29 August 2015
>> >>
>> >> Abstract
>> >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> >> This BIP propose a simple URI scheme for looking up blocks,
>> >> transactions,
>> >> addresses on a Blockchain explorer.
>> >>
>> >> Motivation
>> >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> >> The purpose of this URI scheme is to enable users to handle all the
>> >> requests for details about blocks, transactions, etc. with their
>> >> preferred
>> >> tool (being that a web service or a local application).
>> >>
>> >> Currently a Bitcoin client usually point to an arbitrary blockchain
>> >> explorer when the user look for the details of a transaction (es.
>> >> Bitcoin
>> >> Wallet use BitEasy, Mycelium or Electrum use Blockchain.info, etc.).
>> >> Other times resorting to cut&paste is needed.
>> >> The same happens with posts and messages that reference some particul=
ar
>> >> txs or blocks, if they provide links at all.
>> >>
>> >> Specification
>> >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> >> The URI follow this simple form:
>> >>
>> >> blockchain: <hash/string>
>> >>
>> >> Examples:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> blockchain:00000000000000001003e880d500968d51157f210c632e08a652af3576=
600198
>> >> blockchain:001949
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> blockchain:3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4dfc3f0f7e=
04281a
>> >>
>> >> Rationale
>> >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> >> I thought about using some more complex scheme, or adding qualifiers =
to
>> >> distinguish blocks from txs, but in the end I think that keeping it
>> >> simple
>> >> should be practical enough. Blockchain explorers can apply the same
>> >> disambiguation rules they are already using to process the usual sear=
ch
>> >> box.
>> >>
>> >> From the point of view of a wallet developer (or other tool that need
>> >> to
>> >> show any kind of Blockchain references), using this scheme mean that =
he
>> >> can simply make it a blockchain: link and be done with it, without
>> >> having
>> >> to worry about any specific Blockchain explorer or provide a means fo=
r
>> >> the
>> >> user to select one.
>> >>
>> >> Blockchain explorers in turn will simply offer to handle the
>> >> blockchain:
>> >> URI, the first time the user visit their website, or launch/install t=
he
>> >> application, or even set themselves if there isn't already one.
>> >>
>> >> Users get the convenience of using always their preferred explorer,
>> >> which
>> >> can be especially handy on mobile devices, where juggling with
>> >> cut&paste
>> >> is far from ideal.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Try the Online TrID File Identifier
>> > http://mark0.net/onlinetrid.aspx
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Try the Online TrID File Identifier
> http://mark0.net/onlinetrid.aspx