1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
|
Return-Path: <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DE7E71F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:21:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com
[209.85.192.179])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF45419D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:21:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pdbbh15 with SMTP id bh15so134604pdb.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:message-id:references:to;
bh=3NndT76ahNzwLfT/y4O8DBNT/umXNdafMMBfmf2Cjrg=;
b=kAv2YTwJaewi8Hx9ayyLGTk59hF0D5hovKYiuW1hKLAVFR0Zg+XLE30pwpVbNy+99+
9GTNUXs5gs5HQq0/gWeadJnG8TEa84zAzFPkMovhYEM1ZqFo5g0VX5ehUDzTuavUZboD
MbFVm2TWKtmGWWalG8bcPggysku8ibHTHa3fEuEOKYvpkaaNhC3XiTBa1y2r8fKzo/ch
NFpzFA6lYacTMuRbJv3JrC6FWcLvr50rwQCRxioAawiPTKFZJputGlRyEULSPdho8srU
Qo+aPRxRSo8iKxarLD6p2D+NV6HDPZpMTZYf6anMDjQ3U496COwJn2vGJgcoQsusDz3P
xkXw==
X-Received: by 10.66.55.3 with SMTP id n3mr20873524pap.58.1437675689599;
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.107] (cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com.
[76.167.237.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
ok17sm10230764pdb.26.2015.07.23.11.21.27
(version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_41289139-49EF-4329-A8B9-CB3E57DF4011";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6
From: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <DA1298CE-1C3B-4153-A72D-A0F89D6F1833@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:21:25 -0700
Message-Id: <C7DED50B-0881-4015-8BA6-EAE30EDFB7C5@gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBgs-ouEMu=LOVCmOyCGwfM1Ygxooz0shyvAuHDGGZYfJw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBgugLSVEwDLXhgey86_rM2fTjGWXFuXsiZioJKCZiHiNg@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_WcbnQQGZoQ92twfUvbzqGwu__xLn+BYOkHPZY_YT1pFrbA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPWm=eW8RgrG1CMEAMN4GeiMjZecFvNtZB_Y4rZNeofWSD0=Wg@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_WcYCUHs9Qe_T6WJOCUSK6stXYD8v6z5JcGHfRMURoOSFTA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDq3JyZx0QCRDbcNSLSOBKdpi4h_7VN1XL8N42U38+eBAA@mail.gmail.com>
<55B113AF.40500@thinlink.com>
<CABsx9T1MTc-GmuQyFN1vaFK=CDWV_L214Pi9nR6jLMouQQD0fw@mail.gmail.com>
<trinity-f82ce2cb-7260-4b58-a577-9a1b6afad214-1437670245144@3capp-mailcom-bs02>
<DA1298CE-1C3B-4153-A72D-A0F89D6F1833@mac.com>
To: Robert Learney <robertlearney@mac.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core and hard forks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:21:30 -0000
--Apple-Mail=_41289139-49EF-4329-A8B9-CB3E57DF4011
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_7BA288CB-7143-4C2D-BDF5-8B3F2B93485A"
--Apple-Mail=_7BA288CB-7143-4C2D-BDF5-8B3F2B93485A
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
> On Jul 23, 2015, at 10:14 AM, Robert Learney via bitcoin-dev =
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> That=E2=80=99s not exactly what=E2=80=99s happened though, is it =
Cipher? Gavin put forward 20Mb then after analysis and discussion has =
moved to 8Mb, whereas the other camp of core developers is firmly stuck =
in the =E2=80=981Mb or bust=E2=80=99 group.
The issue isn=E2=80=99t really whether it=E2=80=99s 1MB or 2MB or 4MB or =
8MB or whatever. First of all, the burden of justifying this change =
should be on those proposing a hardfork. The default is to not have a =
hard fork. Second of all, it=E2=80=99s not really about *whether* the =
block size is increased=E2=80=A6but about *when* and *how* it is =
increased. There=E2=80=99s a good argument to be made that right now it =
is more important to address issues such as the fact that validation is =
so expensive (which as others and myself have pointed out has led to a =
collapse of the security model in the past, requiring manual =
intervention to temporarily =E2=80=9Cfix=E2=80=9D)=E2=80=A6and the fact =
that we don=E2=80=99t yet have great solutions to dealing with fees, =
which are a crucial component of the design of the protocol.
--Apple-Mail=_7BA288CB-7143-4C2D-BDF5-8B3F2B93485A
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Dutf-8"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" =
class=3D""><br class=3D""><div><blockquote type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div =
class=3D"">On Jul 23, 2015, at 10:14 AM, Robert Learney via bitcoin-dev =
<<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" =
class=3D"">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:</div><br =
class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=3D""><span =
style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; =
font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; =
line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; =
text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: =
0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline =
!important;" class=3D"">That=E2=80=99s not exactly what=E2=80=99s =
happened though, is it Cipher? Gavin put forward 20Mb then after =
analysis and discussion has moved to 8Mb, whereas the other camp of core =
developers is firmly stuck in the =E2=80=981Mb or bust=E2=80=99 =
group.</span></div></blockquote></div><br class=3D""><div class=3D"">The =
issue isn=E2=80=99t really whether it=E2=80=99s 1MB or 2MB or 4MB or 8MB =
or whatever. First of all, the burden of justifying this change should =
be on those proposing a hardfork. The default is to not have a hard =
fork. Second of all, it=E2=80=99s not really about *whether* the block =
size is increased=E2=80=A6but about *when* and *how* it is increased. =
There=E2=80=99s a good argument to be made that right now it is more =
important to address issues such as the fact that validation is so =
expensive (which as others and myself have pointed out has led to a =
collapse of the security model in the past, requiring manual =
intervention to temporarily =E2=80=9Cfix=E2=80=9D)=E2=80=A6and the fact =
that we don=E2=80=99t yet have great solutions to dealing with fees, =
which are a crucial component of the design of the =
protocol.</div></body></html>=
--Apple-Mail=_7BA288CB-7143-4C2D-BDF5-8B3F2B93485A--
--Apple-Mail=_41289139-49EF-4329-A8B9-CB3E57DF4011
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org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=65tZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_41289139-49EF-4329-A8B9-CB3E57DF4011--
|
