summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/1e/614c00956b38fca20ad172db45f1676509208a
blob: f6ad9ba0572941e9a8339d576910585573def43b (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <joliver@airmail.cc>) id 1YN7JU-0004NY-UD
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:05:16 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of airmail.cc
	designates 75.102.27.230 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=75.102.27.230; envelope-from=joliver@airmail.cc;
	helo=cock.li; 
Received: from cock.li ([75.102.27.230])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YN7JT-0001IU-Kz
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:05:16 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chen.cock.li
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 21:48:59 +0000
From: joliver@airmail.cc
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <E0CB8E24-C67D-48B1-8D9F-2B71BAF13446@bitsofproof.com>
References: <CABm2gDqM6q24tPEBKSHbbVQu-mvfV37PNc4hD=VjyRHk2jujZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<54D0414F.6030806@voskuil.org>
	<CABm2gDo_sYjNWU6EEsKmOXt5uUu87Lj1oFzqio79MxSx2SYrNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<54DE7601.4070509@voskuil.org>
	<CABm2gDpt60B=Sf_2X9xt4fPH7x4fff7K4h36XfosHigV5tP+4Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<54DF07A5.1060004@voskuil.org>
	<CABm2gDoS+XOR7Ugt91kNWNdvwsb1_Zb-aO0sma_Xps2Sx-0N5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<54DF2E80.5060506@voskuil.org>
	<20150214131320.GA26731@savin.petertodd.org>
	<3D4F2E23-CADE-4FE7-B960-3F79815E868C@bitsofproof.com>
	<20150215170228.GB21269@savin.petertodd.org>
	<E0CB8E24-C67D-48B1-8D9F-2B71BAF13446@bitsofproof.com>
Message-ID: <3134a9b920b9c091d4adfcb21083e983@airmail.cc>
X-Sender: joliver@airmail.cc
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1YN7JT-0001IU-Kz
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development]
 =?utf-8?q?On_Rewriting_Bitcoin_=28was_Re=3A?=
 =?utf-8?q?_=5BLibbitcoin=5D_Satoshi_client=3A_is_a_fork_past_0=2E10_possi?=
 =?utf-8?b?YmxlPyk=?=
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:05:17 -0000

On 2015-02-15 17:13, Tamas Blummer wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> 
>> Yes you are dicking around.
> 
> I thought I was clear, that I am using Bitcoin Core as border router
> talking to its P2P interface.
> 
> The reimplementation of consensus code helped me to deeply understand
> the protocol, aids debugging
> and now comes handy to create a side chain.
> 
>> Don't assume your prior experience with other commercial projects
> 
> Acquire some before you claim its useless.

^^^ THIS ^^^

Can we recognize Peter Todd's lack of respect and outright 
unprofesionalism here?

Peter: Someone so young with so little actual experience shouldn't be 
going around so casually bad-mouthing the work of others or dismissing 
people with decades more experience than you. Don't write long angry 
rants against the ideas of others when you haven't even read what they 
have to say. Own up to it when you get caught doing it. You'll find out 
the hard way that blackmailing people, even your clients, into using 
your ideas may get you attention, but it'll make you a pariah in the 
long run. (does encouraging illegal fraud belong on this mailing list?) 
Remember that twitter is public. Do you really want future employers 
reading jokes about pedophilia and rape? Do you want to be known for 
snappy one liners and giving journalists headlines or writing solid code 
that gets used by real businesses? (not "DarkLeaks") Are you trying to 
be a rock star or team member?