1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
|
Return-Path: <tomz@freedommail.ch>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE24ABCA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:07:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mx-out02.mykolab.com (mx.kolabnow.com [95.128.36.1])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D075DFD
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:07:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kolabnow.com
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mx03.mykolab.com (mx03.mykolab.com [10.20.7.101])
by mx-out02.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC3216175E;
Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:07:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Tom Zander <tomz@freedommail.ch>
To: Martin Stolze <martin@stolze.cc>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:10:05 +0200
Message-ID: <4920805.zy6vSeDdRr@cherry>
In-Reply-To: <CAOyfL0oQ8dKECqSdguo5NnSpdVcYMkNKT1pWC8+aGsG2HOY-0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOyfL0oQrHzDmHBnWo0pTdbVU7acnsLmikTh9NU_u6HnhT4VCw@mail.gmail.com>
<2621205.8A4FuXh9CI@strawberry>
<CAOyfL0oQ8dKECqSdguo5NnSpdVcYMkNKT1pWC8+aGsG2HOY-0Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:48:57 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Inquiry: Transaction Tiering
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:07:37 -0000
On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 14:48:42 CEST Martin Stolze wrote:
> Your
> conception holds under the presupposition that all action of
> hash-power is motivated by 'rational' economic interest.
This shows you didn't think this through,
instead, the concept holds true when there is even a small section of hash
power motivated by rational economic interest.
Your claim that it has to be 100% of the miners that need to be honest is
something I already addressed in the previous email when I wrote its a
distributed system.
Since this is an open market, the requirement of a secton of miners being
honest is pretty trivial to fulful, especially since Bitcoins are worth
quite a lot which makes greed be the main cause of honest miners.
This is the best part, greedy miners are the ones that end up working inside
the system.
This is very quickly going off-topic. I suggest you to take it to a
different forum where more people can explain Bitcoin without spamming the
dev list.
--
Tom Zander
Blog: https://zander.github.io
Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel
|
