blob: 65d8d571f257d6051970d1a4eb576d7984019288 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
|
Return-Path: <dave@dtrt.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18107AC8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:53:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.dtrt.org (mail.dtrt.org [207.192.75.234])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D970171
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:53:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from harding by mail.dtrt.org with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <dave@dtrt.org>)
id 1ah3Gu-000139-8l; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:53:32 -0400
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:52:55 -0400
From: "David A. Harding" <dave@dtrt.org>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
Message-ID: <20160318225255.GA5049@localhost.localdomain>
References: <201603081904.28687.luke@dashjr.org>
<201603162224.32315.luke@dashjr.org>
<CADJgMzsc1znp2tXxHa+LFmeZUnHxEcD+rfexg=5rG1T4=fN07A@mail.gmail.com>
<201603181934.54684.luke@dashjr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201603181934.54684.luke@dashjr.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:41:09 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 2 promotion to Final
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:53:35 -0000
Hi,
Arguing about which wiki is better doesn't feel productive to me. Can we
just let BIP authors decide for themselves? Draft-BIP2 already has a
provision for allowing authors to specify a backup wiki of their own
choosing; can we just make that the policy in all cases (and drop the
need for a backup wiki)?
-Dave
|
