1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <timon.elviejo@gmail.com>) id 1SPtEV-0002gV-Km
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 03 May 2012 10:25:59 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.220.175; envelope-from=timon.elviejo@gmail.com;
helo=mail-vx0-f175.google.com;
Received: from mail-vx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1SPtEQ-0005gZ-1r
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 03 May 2012 10:25:59 +0000
Received: by vcbfk14 with SMTP id fk14so547549vcb.34
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 03 May 2012 03:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.38.201 with SMTP id c9mr968607vce.11.1336040748529; Thu,
03 May 2012 03:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.37.201 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2012 03:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <jntkj1$iap$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <1335808239.18613.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
<CALf2ePwm9_aGngzVTKte+3_+yHF=-pcNqTAO0hmkR5rcimEX3g@mail.gmail.com>
<1335810663.39838.YahooMailNeo@web121007.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
<CALf2ePx_+SaANDfvyuTpv=M8rquvjAqSGV5+Uo=wkYKb-oOrLQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP17H-E0mWGGjNS2i0079LuRJ9MnVHSPjR_ots2LR7j9bA@mail.gmail.com>
<jntc3j$h31$1@dough.gmane.org>
<CAGQP0AFehRpjS5zwxgP18DrAqzLK3qqPX7sAYBHZigpVG-msaQ@mail.gmail.com>
<jntkj1$iap$1@dough.gmane.org>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 12:25:48 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGQP0AHVSBmOxxrr0Kwi=84K=07J4-6OBn4YU=bLzZC2THw=LA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= <timon.elviejo@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(timon.elviejo[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1SPtEQ-0005gZ-1r
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 10:25:59 -0000
Maybe he didn't configured them well or didn't tried the right ones.
He said that on the freicoin forum:
http://www.freicoin.org/mobile-app-t28.html
Back to topic...
What do you think about including some smartphone clients in the list?
On 5/3/12, Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de> wrote:
> On 05/03/2012 11:24 AM, Jorge Tim=F3n wrote:
>> On 5/3/12, Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de> wrote:
>>> Can we add Bitcoin Wallet?
>>
>> Someone said to me that the cell phone apps they had tried were still
>> too slow. I'm still using an old phone so I didn't know well what to
>> answer him.
>
> I never measured exactly, but Bitcoin Wallet takes about an hour to
> update its blockchain initially on good WLAN (lightweight approach,
> headers only).
>
> After that, Bitcoin Wallet is just as fast as any other client.
>
> The advantage of that approach is that you are not dependent on any
> server (like Spinner or Electrum). Essentially you're carrying the
> blockchain in your pocket.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andreas
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
--=20
Jorge Tim=F3n
|
