1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <zgenjix@yahoo.com>) id 1R5eDQ-0005kj-B0
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:48:56 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from nm15.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.90.78])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1R5eDM-00046f-D9 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:48:56 +0000
Received: from [98.138.90.48] by nm15.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
19 Sep 2011 13:48:47 -0000
Received: from [98.138.89.163] by tm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
19 Sep 2011 13:48:47 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1019.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
19 Sep 2011 13:48:47 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 250805.84136.bm@omp1019.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 89125 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Sep 2011 13:48:47 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: JbJWt2YVM1nOdSBq.e0yBKlYWxD80RqWwVw3.EyMBUQJyXA
vvZA5f.HzSjgNfGZCKPjQwCrNZ9vyIWmGw2etHrHUWfHhdtAcEuFNnma_dwu
RjKFnnD1H.jYdN.LtcgQKTpmxJIVPEq2XNzAx__vO6JFuBGmjRYZMOdYm9rr
f4IsyScx76n5CVFvT6YHJTLVLnuyuzcrhaZijKSOejaGubb6yg01Unt9w5Ug
PWKbu3KQSE67q3uYyhCOMq6KpZAOH.P2ZgvPa_gTfljy08fK.FWi9Flus27l
byBRchZPX5h_Zs_eFnvEYeV9fRvVIZdzqI1SidOqURNiS_flAVAz7ytTc34L
56928HN2HmESGZ_u2h1Ufjzwq7sXIKswuWtLEc1GQXqbOy6ZHGfexGukrIuS
nKX2lWueeL4q.tFD7Ib4tiSlF0SPoEhD20n4DGMKkh9iC7lH8u86gfK9xAGE
YJGcxNZRuJmUZzI4g_9TwYGt7MPAzsvRCThjkutHHpY1FO6XVhTjI4SVNzyL
VrThyNNL559zkiTB704eFOvjUW3CKaJYh40pTAKLIPbfmBqBkWDmAi4.nX3t
RV_RCW7yMzspbgCA-
Received: from [92.20.114.51] by web121018.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 06:48:47 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.114.317681
References: <201109181930.59565.luke@dashjr.org>
<CABsx9T2FBNv26E4LHmi9GVfi1HLR1wR__qGp1_gjco8rwN0L4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1316440127.85874.YahooMailNeo@web121018.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T2FBNv26E4LHmi9GVfi1HLR1wR__qGp1_gjco8rwN0L4Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [98.138.90.78 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(zgenjix[at]yahoo.com)
-0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1R5eDM-00046f-D9
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.4.x stable branch
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:48:56 -0000
>Eventually, when there are a bunch of bitcoin implementations to=0A=0A>cho=
ose from, I think bitcoin.org should look like bittorrent.org -- it=0A>shou=
ld become a forum for developers to exchange ideas about the=0A>direction o=
f bitcoin.=0A>=0A>Gavin Andresen=0A=0AThanks for your support. This is a no=
ble ideal and will ensure bitcoin's eventual success by serving as a neutra=
l platform for discussions.=0A=0AOne step I've taken in this direction is t=
o setup a process for proposing changes to the bitcoin protocol. See my oth=
er email to this list and this url:=0A=0A=A0 https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bit=
coin_Enhancement_Proposals=0A=0AThe first proposal BEP 0001 is copied from =
Python's PEP 0001 and is a good starting point. I've marked it as a draft s=
ince it's only a non-working proposal. After that with mutual consent and d=
iscussion, we can move it to active status and start to think about setting=
up an arbitration committee.=0A=0AWe should in general favour long discuss=
ion over voting. The Wikipedia model for resolving issues through hammering=
out details is superior to debian with a cycling board of voting members.=
=0A=0AThe bittorrent page looks like a good future ideal to model ourselves=
off of and the EP pages too:=0A=0A=A0 http://bittorrent.org/beps/bep_0000.=
html=0A=0ABEP 0001 needs review and comments. As you can see, bittorrent di=
d the exact same thing here (copying the PEP process) with success:=0A=0A=
=A0 http://bittorrent.org/beps/bep_0001.html=0A=0Agenjix / Amir Taaki=0A
|
