1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
|
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A65BD12
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:27:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ua1-f53.google.com (mail-ua1-f53.google.com
[209.85.222.53])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3652B766
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:27:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua1-f53.google.com with SMTP id r15-v6so21440365uao.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=v5DH7OnMRWSeynyeOoSVczW6IrigS0LoFtynKfr61v4=;
b=D7jbe8gvSH3nPWQumoVjsCWClCw071yabQxeck2yRsF++wG7oFC8Gd/X34KihVsIGF
Awr2/ZlLuU8upcxwbjGbr56XKAObDWi8DwsLHiMs9sprVQzTzMFOopG61EJBRR6B0acJ
MDw+HAmDdJXx01f8J8YPToo0IlacXOb19ofuK5+NYUpEFqIdpOgT9Ja/iLhgwDIejk37
AK920I4kpGCrfaGRRyuEzooHnAlL7w6VRJ3L+orWTIu7ykAd9JmfjfNoAlKvHwxJxNfj
ZFCSy57yGEOS6Rt3dOTKncqgL5BJT7vVneP6lt7PLGqbHuCte/JkhlTBd1OiVU/HfJQJ
7u9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CIOU5pWWm1DT2xbJcGQm/VRhl/EEFM2hM8zi2M/BJcaGjGOaib
Jm4ivFVuyie9OlRTiewZcplKbwxjXJ7ZjxquI3w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZ6ZWgdJfA9vuLspeGSqPXJvs9y6l0SiUq2/rdYNjJuFcGDWQeLxisU+++UXIFIjhNsaJa3wiWKqsNsZsozY04=
X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2065:: with SMTP id 92-v6mr9880203uam.5.1536686843355;
Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPg+sBj7f+=OYXuOMdNeJk3NBG67FSQSF8Xv3seFCvwxCWq69A@mail.gmail.com>
<2e620d305c86f65cbff44b5fba548dc85c118f84.camel@timruffing.de>
<20180812163734.GV499@boulet.lan>
<CAJowKg+h11YkwOo-gyWCw+87Oh-9K34LOnJ1730hhpoVR2m5sA@mail.gmail.com>
<20180903000518.GB18522@boulet.lan>
<CAJowKg+PDtEV3je_N9Ra6u3n4+ZQ3ozYapt8ivxGYYU28Qad+w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgT0uBGbLBOW4TxA-qCzOLwoQ1qSV-R0dMKRzPLAm_UOqQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJowKg+-45h6vraL1PpnqfhHSbG+G40L+FD7xN+C-Dn1E6Y_Vg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgSfdfQ2CiEabjrjspQGQufwzk84f1mzM1j_LRWqAPd8wA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJowKgK3Pxev4pDH4xVLPvmHda8oAfq=fya4TY+_dodUJ7j9Nw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJowKgK3Pxev4pDH4xVLPvmHda8oAfq=fya4TY+_dodUJ7j9Nw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:27:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQOb4UJBkH=pMre=tsbAUmMNYx=4jkBawX4Rc_dKcpwZg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 13:40:01 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Schnorr signatures BIP
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:27:24 -0000
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 5:20 PM Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com> wrote:
> The security advantages of a redistributable threshold system are huge. If a system isn't redistributable, then a single lost or compromised key results in lost coins... meaning the system is essetntially unusable.
>
> I'm actually worried that Bitcoin releases a multisig that encourages loss.
There is no "non- edistributiable multisig" proposed for Bitcoin
anywhere that I am aware of.
|
