summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/10/2a1bb0cbcbd1fbce9c242da35fc4a16b62e0bb
blob: 06e54a37468bc18c25f69d3011d1af1a02639bdd (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
Return-Path: <marek@palatinus.cz>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B608D932
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:44:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C0721AD
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:44:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id o80so23638801wme.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=palatinus-cz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc; bh=pUnWG+Tft37ek4NC28OaRcalnX5aTJ9BpRR539Mlxsc=;
	b=bTY736KQK/zkz2fSB5mx6F5p45aMWi4xU7pCWRoIhuTFygzL9WWomEQC9SWA7dtVVj
	5xTq+5QkBbY6L7zQLqj9/pt4Nfx4+27nwlZTVNs3sUz6ILEzNc4tXkeWThvP0ciZOh6v
	1VH3NZnpLGX4kcIjqBEtPkwDJkPCwgiovzNbVByZBFEXgujp8AkegttctVnOCNthttJ2
	rGdeZgl6PIa7yYMSbGx0rLEkgsVfCC5juBQ9+MSYbmDFKo6pCoakx5Wh2yI5cgcpNgDP
	fSLMnDhrLA29r8noETQehyZYx3M36cMda4+z8bmn7Z5jbtITKvQ59z5xDXR4YS6P1lu4
	852Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:cc;
	bh=pUnWG+Tft37ek4NC28OaRcalnX5aTJ9BpRR539Mlxsc=;
	b=h9OXDoB4ZkvohVuLYYU5r8KaCwWfUwcDdNncSv8ti1f4jBc5y7L3mJaEfBiuYS4P4H
	Bp2OW8v9RmZa8GWz4CkdHpgd1aorc0bFPB1vMgK0mHtPY2h8IVmRm3ozhgOXEfH11Hh1
	0oasN1oW0jAUnDS2zDHDnANS7RAVPe4GpXuNKLcTBqpr/tCXseMiutY6N8QT+8PEXP+z
	YBUtbrQLb11Yls0l3dWgG4R7lrp3IBDh7GGToB5/PGLHlQKE5UtUJ4pGpl6frvPp0CJg
	mN/+5jVbZjbIOVk7Yr1CIPNI4mjXCjC8FsIDR6UKftooYukOeixubwXoQhHf5eSKjxvj
	31yw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoous3x+qOHrpwEsGv0QSyDIdX4ebUdTo7n+IDQRRiLF4yKXCI/U1XKjTPs+bqxuJ0P2hltNO2y40t4U0vcw==
X-Received: by 10.28.197.129 with SMTP id v123mr1608581wmf.70.1471513443857;
	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.43.135 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57B58149.8000200@jonasschnelli.ch>
References: <57B31EBC.1030806@jonasschnelli.ch>
	<e740b4e0-0597-4f80-2434-70e667b7923c@gmail.com>
	<9c8dd0e5-e333-90c8-965f-10fb29d875a5@thomaskerin.io>
	<57B4113E.4010502@jonasschnelli.ch>
	<D41B40FA-0C75-496D-937A-0DF733FB87E2@bitlox.com>
	<57B44BCB.3010400@jonasschnelli.ch>
	<CAJna-HhQred_E7PYRFmgzb_0gd2b+4qsFOWEGqBjfzX1PbhyxQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<57B55B8C.1070001@jonasschnelli.ch>
	<CAJna-Hi3a5mLBkXfS4Qa=kjFCj4=GVBr4WUDZ=Tg27iX=FiCJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<57B58149.8000200@jonasschnelli.ch>
From: Marek Palatinus <marek@palatinus.cz>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:43:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJna-Hj8HQy9Dhx3Gx8CpmpgoiQZ2waaj9o5b6hHwda4Dm_fGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0d4b761a947c053a556c16
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hardware Wallet Standard
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:44:06 -0000

--94eb2c0d4b761a947c053a556c16
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
wrote:

> I agree that BIP70 is a mess (including the bitcoin:// additions). The
> proposed URI scheme would be completely different.


This reminds me https://xkcd.com/927/

I have some experience with hardware wallet development and its integration
and I know it's a mess. But it is too early to define such rigid standards
yet. Also, TREZOR concept (device as a server and the primary source of
workflow management) goes directly against your proposal of wallet software
as an workflow manager. So it is clear NACK for me.

slush

--94eb2c0d4b761a947c053a556c16
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On T=
hu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Jonas Schnelli <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:dev@jonasschnelli.ch" target=3D"_blank">dev@jonasschnelli.ch</a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:</div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gma=
il_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-le=
ft-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I agree=
 that BIP70 is a mess (including the bitcoin:// additions).=C2=A0The propos=
ed URI scheme would be completely different. </blockquote><div><br></div><d=
iv>This reminds me <a href=3D"https://xkcd.com/927/">https://xkcd.com/927/<=
/a></div><div><br></div><div>I have some experience with hardware wallet de=
velopment and its integration and I know it&#39;s a mess. But it is too ear=
ly to define such rigid standards yet. Also, TREZOR concept (device as a se=
rver and the primary source of workflow management) goes directly against y=
our proposal of wallet software as an workflow manager. So it is clear NACK=
 for me.</div><div><br></div><div>slush</div><div><br></div></div></div></d=
iv>

--94eb2c0d4b761a947c053a556c16--