summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/0e/2b3dd7c177ec09950659db9ed74af7ca595fe3
blob: e5fad8b4309a592ea38644893fa3e978e897d10a (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1WeAbk-00060H-W7
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 26 Apr 2014 21:58:05 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.171; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ob0-f171.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com ([209.85.214.171])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WeAbk-00085p-5l
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 26 Apr 2014 21:58:04 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id uy5so5814551obc.16
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 26 Apr 2014 14:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.157.202 with SMTP id wo10mr14144736oeb.9.1398549478844;
	Sat, 26 Apr 2014 14:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.96.180 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Apr 2014 14:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <535C1EBB.5070402@gmail.com>
References: <CABQSq2Q98K5zbUbQAqSE4OYez2QuOaWTt+9n5iZmSR2boynf_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP3EGNsOgHm0P6fiU1P7OSgTd=pBYooPBrLQGMKPT9b8Qg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABQSq2Sgb+JahuL+PTBa6y4OmupUVrg=TQqpQBVJDG96DSj1hA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP2_TX8HMOkVRcucfrF7bDoQBTegDwZbRN4932UzZYZ3gg@mail.gmail.com>
	<535C1EBB.5070402@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 23:57:58 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: SQRwHJrV6Z63tUNF7hq4jujODWs
Message-ID: <CANEZrP1k02cRMdGfzXpudvNRsA=9NE7abtc0YddqvDbz8kj1tw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Alan Reiner <etotheipi@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6c5e8e32eb504f7f92c50
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WeAbk-00085p-5l
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure for P2SH multisig
	wallets
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 21:58:05 -0000

--047d7bd6c5e8e32eb504f7f92c50
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Ah, I see now. Thanks. And actually now I re-read it, Manuel's explanation
was clear, it just didn't sink in for some reason.

--047d7bd6c5e8e32eb504f7f92c50
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div dir="ltr">Ah, I see now. Thanks. And actually now I re-read it, Manuel&#39;s explanation was clear, it just didn&#39;t sink in for some reason.</div>

--047d7bd6c5e8e32eb504f7f92c50--