1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
|
Return-Path: <alicexbt@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E27C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 9 Jun 2022 18:24:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AAC82CFA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 9 Jun 2022 18:24:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URI_DOTEDU=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id eD-5dIANIjeR
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 9 Jun 2022 18:24:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-40135.protonmail.ch (mail-40135.protonmail.ch
[185.70.40.135])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 097A882BF5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 9 Jun 2022 18:24:13 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 18:24:03 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
s=protonmail3; t=1654799051; x=1655058251;
bh=L+y8SHfwHBv0rc32/PP0HWBsvKe9cddyp9xNZ/ge7eA=;
h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:
Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID;
b=Q+X6o9xeu2P01tfeljxi8021x6459qCAh0KukmoS6rlYU2GbWMohYHgM9wBRjIoj3
vGEAjOwWy7UEVKh2/ERSkOVzwbeLkNJOWeY7sj85yfDAaZOCx4i+25wpF1eSKOLF/v
wkuO6pMEKiAu1lj1eh1g9LhRE92ID2md+hpxoKi0Jt2wiR9gLNA9zuWBCtS1KWcltP
eEiYiOAkNzoOQ7dwGjTya30YbN8U5w7t3pybJ20I015Ys49cmgZ+4L+UrQ12qWalm4
YnOtZJ2mKFyti0PEYE9uNrvEECL+z3Mue+UJ+9qmPzyahO/X5+8Ekix2xFvBWuEjs+
UpMYMDKP2b9ag==
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: alicexbt <alicexbt@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: alicexbt <alicexbt@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <dEY4dMW9awXrHkDOv-V7OSpjaPXHONVAaCSQ63gq1lQN0jWqJfeSoB4zlAwTn5I7J2L_YmzwcL_O6SbY9MBPnG845D8wmkauQzXeaD7VykA=@protonmail.com>
Feedback-ID: 40602938:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 18:30:32 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BGP hijacking on Bitcoin p2p network
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 18:24:15 -0000
Hi Bitcoin Developers,
Based on this [answer][1] from 2014, bitcoin nodes are vulnerable to BGP hi=
jacking. There was an incident in March 2022, twitter prefix was hijacked a=
nd details are shared in 2 blog posts:
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/rss/28488
https://www.manrs.org/2022/03/lesson-learned-twitter-shored-up-its-routing-=
security/
'nusenu' had written an article about Tor network being vulnerable to BGP h=
ijacking attacks: https://nusenu.medium.com/how-vulnerable-is-the-tor-netwo=
rk-to-bgp-hijacking-attacks-56d3b2ebfd92
After doing some research I found that RPKI ROA and BGP prefix length can h=
elp against BGP hijacking attacks. I checked BGP prefix length and RPKI ROA=
for first 10 IP addresses returned in `getnodeaddresses` in bitcoin core a=
nd it had vulnerable results.
https://i.stack.imgur.com/KD7jH.png
Has anyone written a detailed blog post or research article like nusenu? If=
not I would be interested to write one in next couple of weeks?
Looking for some "technical" feedback, links if this was already discussed =
in past with some solutions.
=C2=A0 [1]: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/30305/133407
/dev/fd0
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
|
