summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/0c/e5b0f08727b3c255c161e36092e29f72f9015c
blob: a8daf18d39e10cec87d06fe1ff772e2c1aa930f2 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
Return-Path: <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B2EE17A3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:04:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com
	[209.85.220.45])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7937D
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:04:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pablk4 with SMTP id lk4so75051843pab.3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 04:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:date:to:cc:message-id;
	bh=7//MPPZvIut6WiUvDbfgueIxgGE2lp9/GRLbbInovE8=;
	b=q71O5GUPbEralBbvK/UlDt1+72M2/OgJLnVOhNnEEX0RC2qq6ZzaO7/QsfKmUL9PQC
	4QGAk82kuJRlQYdqrSHwZwVpC6nDxSngcK8mCalKfgmJcF5rWvwkvl/JU54hN32xd0Oj
	hvkA0vOSjLh/Je2cUlrnw4UU4puP6KyIfIhADnmozMelIeKInu+1nz/tRfMZ5QXy8q86
	tcv2DUdgFploX2BbEoid9REmfvc/Eeyt5i4R05PaI2hKfOPSiYemKHUmWaoEzDF1B7eJ
	fR95QJQNzOoJJafoaw7D9ZjEnbgOLEH3PNRUkpmp67UPXVdQUcb/4LHCeFZrr3nvKr0I
	7hFw==
X-Received: by 10.66.142.202 with SMTP id ry10mr26482320pab.86.1443438283733; 
	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 04:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com.
	[76.167.237.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
	rb8sm18815240pab.14.2015.09.28.04.04.42
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 04:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <CA+w+GKRCVr-9TVk66utp7xLRgTxNpxYoj3XQE-6y_N8JS6eO6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CA+w+GKRCVr-9TVk66utp7xLRgTxNpxYoj3XQE-6y_N8JS6eO6Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 04:04:49 -0700
To: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>,
	Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Message-ID: <10248633-FD7B-4D07-B4A2-27EC5D0AC0D3@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:04:44 -0000

------K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8

My initial reaction is just HUH?!?!? Is this some sophisticated form of humor I'm just not getting?

On September 28, 2015 3:48:57 AM PDT, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>There is *no* consensus on using a soft fork to deploy this feature. It
>will result in the same problems as all the other soft forks - SPV
>wallets
>will become less reliable during the rollout period. I am against that,
>as
>it's entirely avoidable.
>
>Make it a hard fork and my objection will be dropped.
>
>Until then, as there is no consensus, you need to do one of two things:
>
>1) Drop the "everyone must agree to make changes" idea that people here
>like to peddle, and do it loudly, so everyone in the community is
>correctly
>informed
>
>2) Do nothing
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>bitcoin-dev mailing list
>bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
------K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html><head></head><body>My initial reaction is just HUH?!?!? Is this some sophisticated form of humor I&#39;m just not getting?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On September 28, 2015 3:48:57 AM PDT, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev &lt;bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">There is <b>no</b> consensus on using a soft fork to deploy this feature. It will result in the same problems as all the other soft forks - SPV wallets will become less reliable during the rollout period. I am against that, as it&#39;s entirely avoidable.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Make it a hard fork and my objection will be dropped.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Until then, as there is no consensus, you need to do one of two things:</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">1) Drop the &quot;everyone must agree to make changes&quot; idea that people here like to peddle, and do it loudly, so everyone in the community is correctly informed</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">2) Do nothing</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div></div>
<p style="margin-top: 2.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; border-bottom: 1px solid #000"></p><pre class="k9mail"><hr /><br />bitcoin-dev mailing list<br />bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org<br /><a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>
------K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF--