1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mats@henricson.se>) id 1YzYLM-0007QR-Aj
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:38:04 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from postman.datakultur.com ([213.212.33.189])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1YzYLK-0005o0-ES for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:38:04 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by postman.datakultur.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D48100AEA6
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:22:03 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postman.datakultur.com
Received: from postman.datakultur.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (postman.datakultur.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024) with ESMTP id VTrPAXWuPglz
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:22:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.11] (c80-216-178-136.bredband.comhem.se
[80.216.178.136])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by postman.datakultur.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2B91100AEA1
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:22:01 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <556CDB09.8050906@henricson.se>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 00:22:01 +0200
From: Mats Henricson <mats@henricson.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1YzYLK-0005o0-ES
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:38:04 -0000
Hi!
My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate
drives me nuts.
I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:
1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will
take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other
smarter people have said over and over before, you're
wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't.
2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is
just destructive. If you want no change, then say so.
Mats
|
