1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
|
Return-Path: <slashene@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCF4C9C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:59:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com (mail-lb0-f169.google.com
[209.85.217.169])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 085FB1AE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:59:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbbsx3 with SMTP id sx3so47420481lbb.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=9jGYkL8d7O6fqvRNTA1JzY/k+aRrJAI40aet6h1gWLg=;
b=kNulnSaSF5UE2ImmAGb19st47bJWiEVl0BBQs37+rBo+GeVkLz0XeJ3ZW8a6SJ6uCv
po9QnbXuOSpXghn8rXCa/M/H/Xtan7Knt9YKNtNa8bcqvZlBypmHAoPyxjA2ypix1jLd
JSWvOlgF+1pzUpIpZdWPa+0Uc1JrgOMj2/i4nFZQVTnJupSm9kFnBRBSTOMbHoFg5ZBB
u6XDbJciES2rxkWBPudPLfvRJdVUJYuArGJCmQwGjEqnCk8HSM4r0Jjq7JYRHk49xU/S
BhQBl7mKakmg8uq/sDKRdAkshP9egda3zE39g4TcjMgKN21roTqQOQ8xODDc6ZORD7ep
8yZA==
X-Received: by 10.152.42.170 with SMTP id p10mr8430616lal.39.1440176350297;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: slashene@gmail.com
Received: by 10.25.142.15 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3B2A58B3-6AF6-4F1C-A6FA-7AEC97F48AD0@petertodd.org>
References: <CA+1nnrk1EWd7rhwj91p1rqgGVFgOT4UYq=+Nmq41sHJYmy7YYA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgR4bsJtC99-fK1L+FsQT7vOfOpz9FOVqvAnqbpkaRJHLQ@mail.gmail.com>
<BE291934-F40A-4163-834C-6B3FFBD7C4E0@petertodd.org>
<CADJgMzucVKgQQtzwBNMcU3Vy=ae+2jMQY=am_xYXcKtyforpUg@mail.gmail.com>
<3B2A58B3-6AF6-4F1C-A6FA-7AEC97F48AD0@petertodd.org>
From: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 01:58:50 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: qdOTgvymQZNIzLPPptcv3Vhzcs4
Message-ID: <CA+1nnrnqS6+9vEB0KBUpfaF6q2CTXPy-2M8JkHXXm5nXzmx-Lw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c34c78c6059d051dd52f8a
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Core Devs : can you share your thoughts about all
BIPs on this website ?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:59:14 -0000
--001a11c34c78c6059d051dd52f8a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
My UX skills are lacking a bit. You can edit all your thoughts about each
BIP, HTML is accepted, so you can link to other posts you made somewhere
else.
When you click on a cell in the grid, it forward you to the page that the
dev edited for this BIP.
This website is not only to say "approve", "disapprove", nor is it about a
formal process for reaching agreement.
This is a tool, a portal, which educates people, and permit you to link all
of your thoughts about the various BIP and show it to others.
With the opinions browse able from the same website, you will notice in a
gleam as soon as one of those proposal reach consensus. (I think SIPA's BIP
has a chance to do so, but nobody knows it yet)
Sadly, the most controversial is a BIP, the noisier it is, at the expense
of those which are not. (like sipa's one).
It irritates me a lot that the debate in public mind is "XT or not" /
"Bigger blocks or not", when in reality there is lots of different
proposals that might also reach consensus but are lost in the noise.
I will add any BIP that at least one voter approve and want to push forward.
I plan to add merchants/wallet providers/mining pools later.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
>
> On 21 August 2015 02:31:51 GMT-07:00, Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
> ><bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> What might be valuable is to ask devs to explain what their threat
> >models are, what should be at the root of their thinking about the
> >blocksize.
> >
> >That's exactly what the "Technical Opinion" column is for.
>
> What if could be used for; theres value in being more explicit.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV1vDG
> AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MIAIMtLLA4q7KJiwrYrpjFWme1ys9iyPZiADJGQWG3qKlH
> Q4pEcwWt69jfTUCjLYfegsDW4eEMarejs568iSF70hvGB4OPWrYK3YiM1cWlWtDD
> seN3G/4dJjehL7h1Nz+/OTjTlePkguHctRlJTavel8sI7fg356iMJc1Ggm5Q1ZFl
> CLrivr/CEO7Qk9Uo5ewhnwConKjLygSyv67SSaMJW7pZB06uTX6M3lk11c/RB/C6
> JKPqxkvOmNIX9U8S/G3Y2pYf3/up72IhP0Ugp31iOsz629B2WvEsDYu/0SP61+oZ
> za9HrP2g8OsxVq6SUD3MukmbRVKklvcnro4vk5sOlYI=
> =Jfl+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--001a11c34c78c6059d051dd52f8a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">My UX skills are lacking a bit. You can edit all your thou=
ghts about each BIP, HTML is accepted, so you can link to other posts you m=
ade somewhere else.=C2=A0<div>When you click on a cell in the grid, it forw=
ard you to the page that the dev edited for this BIP.<div><br>This website =
is not only to say "approve", "disapprove", nor is it a=
bout a formal process for reaching agreement.=C2=A0</div><div>This is a too=
l, a portal, which educates people, and permit you to link all of your thou=
ghts about the various BIP and show it to others.</div><div><br><div>With t=
he opinions browse able from the same website, you will notice in a gleam a=
s soon as one of those proposal reach consensus. (I think SIPA's BIP ha=
s a chance to do so, but nobody knows it yet)<br></div><div>Sadly, the most=
controversial is a BIP, the noisier it is, at the expense of those which a=
re not. (like sipa's one).</div><div><br></div><div>It irritates me a l=
ot that the debate in public mind is "XT or not" / "Bigger b=
locks or not", when in reality there is lots of different proposals th=
at might also reach consensus but are lost in the noise.</div><div>I will a=
dd any BIP that at least one voter approve and want to push forward.</div><=
div>I plan to add merchants/wallet providers/mining pools later.=C2=A0</div=
><div><br></div></div></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Peter Todd <span dir=3D"l=
tr"><<a href=3D"mailto:pete@petertodd.org" target=3D"_blank">pete@petert=
odd.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D=
"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=
=3D"">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA512<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span><div><div class=3D"h5">On 21 August 2015 02:31:51 GMT-07:00, Btc Dra=
k <<a href=3D"mailto:btcdrak@gmail.com">btcdrak@gmail.com</a>> wrote:=
<br>
>On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev<br>
><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-de=
v@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> What might be valuable is to ask devs to explain what their threat=
<br>
>models are, what should be at the root of their thinking about the<br>
>blocksize.<br>
><br>
>That's exactly what the "Technical Opinion" column is for=
.<br>
<br>
</div></div>What if could be used for; theres value in being more explicit.=
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
iQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV1vDG<br>
AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MIAIMtLLA4q7KJiwrYrpjFWme1ys9iyPZiADJGQWG3qKlH<br>
Q4pEcwWt69jfTUCjLYfegsDW4eEMarejs568iSF70hvGB4OPWrYK3YiM1cWlWtDD<br>
seN3G/4dJjehL7h1Nz+/OTjTlePkguHctRlJTavel8sI7fg356iMJc1Ggm5Q1ZFl<br>
CLrivr/CEO7Qk9Uo5ewhnwConKjLygSyv67SSaMJW7pZB06uTX6M3lk11c/RB/C6<br>
JKPqxkvOmNIX9U8S/G3Y2pYf3/up72IhP0Ugp31iOsz629B2WvEsDYu/0SP61+oZ<br>
za9HrP2g8OsxVq6SUD3MukmbRVKklvcnro4vk5sOlYI=3D<br>
=3DJfl+<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a11c34c78c6059d051dd52f8a--
|
