1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
|
Return-Path: <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81483B3F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 4 Apr 2017 17:03:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 01:00:00 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from pv33p36im-asmtp001.me.com (pv33p36im-asmtp001.me.com
[17.142.213.62])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42ED6206
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 4 Apr 2017 17:03:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from process-dkim-sign-daemon.pv33p36im-asmtp001.me.com by
pv33p36im-asmtp001.me.com
(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.38.0 64bit (built Feb 26
2016)) id <0ONW009006IRBH00@pv33p36im-asmtp001.me.com> for
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org;
Tue, 04 Apr 2017 16:03:55 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=4d515a;
t=1491321835; bh=t/VeGgcaKKjllkWnTRour7F98s97pa/8Ykg1qzFNE28=;
h=Content-type:MIME-version:Subject:From:Date:Message-id:To;
b=ceqZc9x1arAfFt3Wmh7CA8SkC37qlxL9lkk9jwJolurwmkyu8MXkmuH94SyNTuUjK
mhOykBm4whHeFpLZ6BMeSzQ1tk21rNOC87y6g/Fc/B1znUBZg+j+9AZRjQ+eCdEHRs
DW4xRTiDJJwOiYa/LJiEL4OOHEUtTE8vpdIGbZIxc1a63qFefA/M4JGWFNaAvS2DBW
+3IdY13A/mNUgDz2r2YB3HATQ3W0Ue4pmJMR5z/HmGUSymnVCCIwafY9f3XFSVXFmM
iFk73qLe1uf7fkthOeOachH14Jhzka5grPIPhhahXMFqKLSCvvy3bnmmX06yY0u9zU
4WoqhmFKQWEqA==
Received: from icloud.com ([127.0.0.1]) by pv33p36im-asmtp001.me.com
(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.38.0 64bit (built Feb 26
2016))
with ESMTPSA id <0ONW006UT7AF4150@pv33p36im-asmtp001.me.com>; Tue,
04 Apr 2017 16:03:53 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,,
definitions=2017-04-04_12:,, signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
clxscore=1034 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0
bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1
engine=8.0.1-1701120000 definitions=main-1704040139
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=Apple-Mail-DF446C48-7DAA-413E-85D0-B762DD9C53A5
MIME-version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14E304)
In-reply-to: <CAB3F3DtuYjxp6Cg-nprq7qZanF_F2y0xUM7RUzoJ7Fdn9HtJXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 09:03:51 -0700
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Message-id: <5719296D-9908-4FB0-B530-AF23D6DE9949@me.com>
References: <2D094CEC-3756-45B0-970F-1EB33DF352C5@xbt.hk>
<7465915.Qhm6HcGyAn@strawberry>
<CADvTj4pOGTdopFG2NPGgEkS2y44FwKMEm2_ANQapGirqbZHP+g@mail.gmail.com>
<2021960.L2etkeoJTU@strawberry>
<CAB3F3DtuYjxp6Cg-nprq7qZanF_F2y0xUM7RUzoJ7Fdn9HtJXw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 17:04:22 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP draft: Extended block header hardfork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 17:03:56 -0000
--Apple-Mail-DF446C48-7DAA-413E-85D0-B762DD9C53A5
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=gb2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tom,
It's clear that you have some rather large gaps in your knowledge of Bitcoin=
, its rules, implementation and game theory. I highly encourage you spend so=
me time learning more about these things before continuing posting here.=20
https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinBeginners/ is a good place to start. It's a s=
afe place where you can ask any question you want without fear of being laug=
hed at.
Kind regards,
Jean-Paul
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 8:44 AM, Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@list=
s.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> That's BIP30, he linked BIP34: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/mas=
ter/src/validation.cpp#L3004
>=20
>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@=
lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> Can you tell me where it is enforced?
>>=20
>> The only place I found was here;
>> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp#L1793
>>=20
>> which doesn=A1=AFt enforce it, all that code does is check that the txid i=
s
>> unknown or fully spent.
>> And since the below idea from Russel would change the txid, it would seem=
no
>> full client would reject this.
>>=20
>> Maybe its in a BIP, but I can=A1=AFt find it in the code.
>>=20
>> On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 16:59:12 CEST James Hilliard wrote:
>> > It is a consensus rule
>> > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0034.mediawiki
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev
>> >
>> > <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > > On Sunday, 2 April 2017 22:39:13 CEST Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-de=
v
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >> Someone told me a while back that it would be more natural if we mo=
ve
>> > >> the
>> > >>
>> > >> nHeight from the coinbase script to the coinbase locktime. Have you=
>> > >> considered doing this?
>> > >
>> > > That change would not be a consensus change and thus free to make any=
>> > > day.
>>=20
>>=20
>> --
>> Tom Zander
>> Blog: https://zander.github.io
>> Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--Apple-Mail-DF446C48-7DAA-413E-85D0-B762DD9C53A5
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D=
utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto"><div>Tom,</div><div id=3D"AppleMailSignatur=
e"><br></div><div id=3D"AppleMailSignature">It's clear that you have some ra=
ther large gaps in your knowledge of Bitcoin, its rules, implementation and g=
ame theory. I highly encourage you spend some time learning more about these=
things before continuing posting here. </div><div id=3D"AppleMailSigna=
ture"><br></div><div id=3D"AppleMailSignature"><a href=3D"https://www.reddit=
.com/r/BitcoinBeginners/">https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinBeginners/</a> is a=
good place to start. It's a safe place where you can ask any question you w=
ant without fear of being laughed at.</div><div id=3D"AppleMailSignature"><b=
r></div><div id=3D"AppleMailSignature">Kind regards,</div><div id=3D"AppleMa=
ilSignature"><br><br>Jean-Paul</div><div><br>On Apr 4, 2017, at 8:44 AM, Gre=
g Sanders via bitcoin-dev <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfound=
ation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></div=
><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><div dir=3D"ltr">That's BIP30, he linked BIP=
34: <a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/valid=
ation.cpp#L3004">https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validati=
on.cpp#L3004</a></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D=
"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D=
"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #cc=
c solid;padding-left:1ex">Can you tell me where it is enforced?<br>
<br>
The only place I found was here;<br>
<a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp=
#L1793" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/<wbr=
>bitcoin/blob/master/src/<wbr>validation.cpp#L1793</a><br>
<br>
which doesn=E2=80=99t enforce it, all that code does is check that the txid i=
s<br>
unknown or fully spent.<br>
And since the below idea from Russel would change the txid, it would seem no=
<br>
full client would reject this.<br>
<br>
Maybe its in a BIP, but I can=E2=80=99t find it in the code.<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 16:59:12 CEST James Hilliard wrote:<br>
> It is a consensus rule<br>
> <a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0034.mediawi=
ki" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/<wbr>bip=
s/blob/master/bip-0034.<wbr>mediawiki</a><br>
><br>
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev<br>
><br>
> <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-de=
v@lists.<wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> > On Sunday, 2 April 2017 22:39:13 CEST Russell O'Connor via bitcoin=
-dev<br>
> ><br>
> > wrote:<br>
> >> Someone told me a while back that it would be more natur=
al if we move<br>
> >> the<br>
> >><br>
> >> nHeight from the coinbase script to the coinbase locktime.&nbs=
p; Have you<br>
> >> considered doing this?<br>
> ><br>
> > That change would not be a consensus change and thus free to make a=
ny<br>
> > day.<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Tom Zander<br>
Blog: <a href=3D"https://zander.github.io" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_bla=
nk">https://zander.github.io</a><br>
Vlog: <a href=3D"https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel" rel=3D"norefe=
rrer" target=3D"_blank">https://vimeo.com/channels/<wbr>tomscryptochannel</a=
><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.<=
wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" r=
el=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org/m=
ailman/listinfo/bitcoin-<wbr>dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><span>____________________=
___________________________</span><br><span>bitcoin-dev mailing list</span><=
br><span><a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-de=
v@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a></span><br><span><a href=3D"https://lists.lin=
uxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev">https://lists.linuxfoundation=
.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></=
html>=
--Apple-Mail-DF446C48-7DAA-413E-85D0-B762DD9C53A5--
|
