summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/0b/626b8c33cfe94cf1ccf96096d6c3a8dda20b56
blob: 619113c9b293a6fc5cfbccd520c21e9fd65fd217 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 284AE486
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 21 Aug 2015 04:45:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com
	[209.85.213.173])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BB2DEB
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 21 Aug 2015 04:45:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igbjg10 with SMTP id jg10so6414567igb.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=l41oheIYl0qa7YRzkUFUfHycUPGA6P+YUL/5iZV2SiA=;
	b=l+fxTA7Gv04nkl06ukCHyfdi8sJvzb1vn/wI9+4Ii+4iws9AY5DYCnTEDczg5PwW3n
	lMxgF63IH7uszRW8rkZd9g9Snu/3SlUrv4qoFfvR9lLnHsHjxjRuUjZD5Zk99Cs6DCNf
	dCmlbdFHmI6RmUhQDMkgAxJ339oaGnVI0Hb4d0PkVfLCwFtKFU0fyUPXDu07/W1Jkwnz
	qOFok7g4ajoRUJL+eToFRK/7WRTHjXQlPU9WOsCzjhPaFpDdReB3nnXJi24QfYk0gcJB
	i/TkPAdj6Qultn7h0M8Y4nQTqWVTtM8/dEnZuAiNpJunH1qPAFXA9+G5msu4cwBr7/ix
	+69A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.61.195 with SMTP id s3mr1342836igr.62.1440132323107; Thu,
	20 Aug 2015 21:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.14.136 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+1nnrk1EWd7rhwj91p1rqgGVFgOT4UYq=+Nmq41sHJYmy7YYA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+1nnrk1EWd7rhwj91p1rqgGVFgOT4UYq=+Nmq41sHJYmy7YYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 04:45:23 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgR4bsJtC99-fK1L+FsQT7vOfOpz9FOVqvAnqbpkaRJHLQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Core Devs : can you share your thoughts about all
 BIPs on this website ?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 04:45:24 -0000

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I created a small website which show a chart of your approvals about various
> BIPs (which you must fill by yourself with a signed pgp message)
> For each BIP, you can fill if you approve or not, and give comments. (HTML
> accepted, so you can link stuff you your posts)
> It would help the community a lot, so I hope you will do it !
> I'm open to add other important devs, big miners, or other proposal that I
> missed.


I think this is a bit well, sad, at the moment--  a basic principle in
sound decision making is that one should try to withhold judgement
until after the analysis and options are laid out to avoid prematurely
laying down "battle lines" which then they're socially and politically
committed to a particular answer.


There are several other BIPs in the works right now that aren't out
there yet, as well (as presumably) new insight from the workshop. It
would be a shame if these things would be for naught because of being
decided prematurely.