1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <billhees@gmail.com>) id 1UsfPs-0005Do-4U
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 28 Jun 2013 20:37:12 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.216.44 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.216.44; envelope-from=billhees@gmail.com;
helo=mail-qa0-f44.google.com;
Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1UsfPq-0005Wb-Al
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 28 Jun 2013 20:37:12 +0000
Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id o13so874890qaj.17
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.62.33 with SMTP id v1mr19071933qer.53.1372451824823; Fri,
28 Jun 2013 13:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.12.113 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFtwHRewE0wgvWsf-785hpCb8ns7wiGaKHAQ-1QmDD-W+diBJA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1372353053.10405.140661249237317.77984E1F@webmail.messagingengine.com>
<CAJHLa0Ncac9Xt-AQBnpghqqpfR-j6Xtd9qVQoUe2dPp0kJvz1A@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP0k1HDrJC9DOn6JYiVcaRRXwVwxW7ZPjE9XvfTCHXX6pw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T3GJN0inGChebJt_dRLpVrPw7BTH8oQo6F4q6yFJaOoCA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFtwHRewE0wgvWsf-785hpCb8ns7wiGaKHAQ-1QmDD-W+diBJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:37:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFtwHReqVCZAuoik24Sm=K0eCF1CGtEtxkAYVnoueTgCRT10mA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bill Hees <billhees@gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f5036427d741d04e03cd7a0
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(billhees[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1UsfPq-0005Wb-Al
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: MultiBit as default desktop
client on bitcoin.org
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 20:37:12 -0000
--e89a8f5036427d741d04e03cd7a0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
There are good, valid arguments in support of promoting both the reference
client, Bitcoin-QT, and for offering a lighter-weight alternative. Why not
outline these arguments on bitcoin.org and provide links to each; or even
links to a variety of alternative wallet solutions alongside descriptions
of their respective benefits and drawbacks? Is there an advantage to having
a singular "recommended" client?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Bill Hees <billhees@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are good, valid arguments in support of promoting both the reference
> client, Bitcoin-QT, and for offering a lighter-weight alternative. Why not
> outline these arguments on bitcoin.org and provide links to each; or even
> links to a variety of alternative wallet solutions alongside descriptions
> of their respective benefits and drawbacks? Is there an advantage to having
> a singular "recommended" client?
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I vote "yes" to have MultiBit replace Bitcoin-Qt as the recommended
>> desktop wallet app. I think most users will be happier with it.
>>
>> If I'm wrong, it is easy to change back.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>
>> Build for Windows Store.
>>
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>
>
>
--e89a8f5036427d741d04e03cd7a0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><br>There are good, valid arguments in support of promotin=
g both the reference client, Bitcoin-QT, and for offering a lighter-weight =
alternative. Why not outline these arguments on <a href=3D"http://bitcoin.o=
rg">bitcoin.org</a> and provide links to each; or even links to a variety o=
f alternative wallet solutions alongside descriptions of their respective b=
enefits and drawbacks? Is there an advantage to having a singular "rec=
ommended" client?</div>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 2=
8, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Bill Hees <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:billh=
ees@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">billhees@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<b=
r><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:=
1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr">There are good, valid arguments in support of promoting bo=
th the reference client,=A0Bitcoin-QT, and for offering a lighter-weight al=
ternative. Why not outline these arguments on <a href=3D"http://bitcoin.org=
" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin.org</a> and provide links to each; or even link=
s to a variety of alternative wallet solutions alongside descriptions of th=
eir respective benefits and drawbacks? Is there an advantage to having a si=
ngular "recommended" client?<br>
</div><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><b=
r><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Gavin And=
resen <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:gavinandresen@gmail.com" targ=
et=3D"_blank">gavinandresen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I vote "yes" to have MultiBit repl=
ace Bitcoin-Qt as the recommended<br>
desktop wallet app. I think most users will be happier with it.<br>
<br>
If I'm wrong, it is easy to change back.<br>
<div><div><br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:<br>
<br>
Build for Windows Store.<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev" target=3D"_blank">http://p.=
sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" target=3D"_bla=
nk">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
--e89a8f5036427d741d04e03cd7a0--
|
