summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/0a/8e78c59894e128fcb4bb6f009a8e73cc4f0973
blob: 3ff7ce45afd72b9a71bc45a098c6ac42052e2f96 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Return-Path: <xor@freenetproject.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92BD7268
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:47:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de
	[80.67.18.16])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03B4487
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:47:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [89.14.30.64] (helo=anonymous)
	by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa
	(TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84)
	(envelope-from <xor@freenetproject.org>) id 1ZxjbV-0002k6-Fc
	for bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org;
	Sat, 14 Nov 2015 23:47:29 +0100
From: xor <xor@freenetproject.org>
To: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Reply-To: xor@freenetproject.org
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 23:47:23 +0100
Message-ID: <1910992.nPu4WaYHE8@1337h4x0r>
Organization: Freenet Project
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-68-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CADm_WcZnOXqcse1LC28ptLyxXJTtbv+RPMfrMamR4xZK3xcK8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1581446.3ZPnhFUSFq@1337h4x0r>
	<CADm_WcZnOXqcse1LC28ptLyxXJTtbv+RPMfrMamR4xZK3xcK8Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart21621398.PSQUeYnAd1";
	micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Df-Sender: eG9yQGZyZWVtYWlsLmJvZ2VydC5kZQ==
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 23:20:18 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Contradiction in BIP65 text?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:47:33 -0000


--nextPart21621398.PSQUeYnAd1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Friday, November 13, 2015 06:58:07 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:48 PM, xor via bitcoin-dev <
>=20
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This clearly says that funds can be frozen.
> > Can the BIP65-thing be used to freeze funds or can it not be?
>=20
> This language definitely trips up or worries several folks - it's bee=
n
> mentioned a few times before.
>=20
> The user _chooses_ to freeze _their own_ funds.  It is not an unwilli=
ng act
> of force, which many assume when they see the phrase "freeze funds."

Oh, interesting, albeit that was not subject of my question.

My question in fact was whether *I* can use it to freeze *my* funds; be=
cause I=20
think that would be an interesting feature for various purposes.
From=20the state of BIP65 I talked about, it is not even clear whether th=
at is=20
possible.

Your observation beyond that is a valid concern though.
So both should be addressed.
--nextPart21621398.PSQUeYnAd1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=Rg+O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart21621398.PSQUeYnAd1--