summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/06/d94d3282bd9c07a26a7a45f255bc3f87ffab14
blob: 39f0a103450c9e69ef6b22178be56c220a83e88d (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <sipa@ulyssis.org>) id 1QdKA6-0000aJ-M3
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 03 Jul 2011 10:44:26 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.129]
	helo=cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be)
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1QdKA5-00084B-Ae for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 03 Jul 2011 10:44:26 +0000
X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: sipa@ulyssis.org
X-Spam-Status: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-48.798, required 5, 
	autolearn=disabled, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED 0.00,
	FREEMAIL_FROM 0.00, KUL_SMTPS -50.00, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED 1.20)
X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean
X-KULeuven-ID: D5F2D13818D.A9B8C
X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Received: from smtps01.kuleuven.be (smtpshost01.kulnet.kuleuven.be
	[134.58.240.74])
	by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F2D13818D;
	Sun,  3 Jul 2011 12:44:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.ulyssis.org (mail.ulyssis.student.kuleuven.be
	[193.190.253.235])
	by smtps01.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6927231E702;
	Sun,  3 Jul 2011 12:44:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from wop.ulyssis.org (wop.intern.ulyssis.org [192.168.0.182])
	by smtp.ulyssis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F20C10067;
	Sun,  3 Jul 2011 12:45:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wop.ulyssis.org (Postfix, from userid 615)
	id 6562287C1AB; Sun,  3 Jul 2011 12:44:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 12:44:17 +0200
X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
To: John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110703104415.GA2034@ulyssis.org>
References: <CAJNQ0stvozeQAVFkduY7Ph5EXy8ayYwiu4T+6Oz1RwjgiDnBeA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJNQ0stvozeQAVFkduY7Ph5EXy8ayYwiu4T+6Oz1RwjgiDnBeA@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key: http://sipa.ulyssis.org/pubkey.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com)
	0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED   No valid author signature, adsp_override is
	CUSTOM_MED 1.2 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED    ADSP custom_med hit,
	and not from a mailing list
X-Headers-End: 1QdKA5-00084B-Ae
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsider build system change?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 10:44:26 -0000

On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 07:29:04AM +0000, John Smith wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Why again did we choose for autotools as future build system instead of
> cmake?

I have no preference for any particular project build system. If a system
* is easy enough to set up (included in standard repositories, eg.)
* allows building of the bitcoin codebase on several linux distro's
* does cross-compilation to windows
* supports osx
* is easy to maintain
* it is not too hard to adapt other GUI's to use it (bitcoin-qt,
  maybe others as well, i hear about a cocoabitcoin?)
* gets implemented and tested to support all of the above
.. i have no problem with choosing that system for future versions.

-- 
Pieter