1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1YIi4r-00061M-9P
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 03 Feb 2015 18:19:57 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.213.46 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.213.46; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com;
helo=mail-yh0-f46.google.com;
Received: from mail-yh0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1YIi4q-0007Py-EB
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 03 Feb 2015 18:19:57 +0000
Received: by mail-yh0-f46.google.com with SMTP id c41so19196696yho.5
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 03 Feb 2015 10:19:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.26.233 with SMTP id c69mr10717876yha.49.1422987590926;
Tue, 03 Feb 2015 10:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.130.210 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:19:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBi8_wQj1ZGWUPQ4rRmuPKt3=OY6HcRZmVLqGMeLNwhpPQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBhk7F2OHT64i2LNSjv8DR5tD3RJkLJGzPGZW8OPQTCjQw@mail.gmail.com>
<87egqnwt7g.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
<CAPg+sBjQAi_hCcoV0gecVQAd4PYKzRd5F_nymz8UVt9BFg8O2Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgQjTq1M6fF5KDiZ-qBrCWjs9z5VKtj-c1ghRfDeK6iyPA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBjjYLf4NZ8ezK7ML_OO-e6C8_V1i12AXejjrgp+wFB-pg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+s+GJDcyEqAm4bwCJsgDQiT14kZiLzmwOgLn-oC_SHZTg7sew@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBi8_wQj1ZGWUPQ4rRmuPKt3=OY6HcRZmVLqGMeLNwhpPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 13:19:50 -0500
Message-ID: <CABsx9T3f70m-LtwYopX5D-ojuRRr-o4WeKxaz5SbiR7RYPeyCQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1bfd8e0885f050e331d04
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gavinandresen[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1YIi4q-0007Py-EB
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 18:19:57 -0000
--001a11c1bfd8e0885f050e331d04
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I think we should just do it, and include it with the other DERSIG changes
for 0.10.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> I understand it's late, which is also why I ask for opinions. It's
> also not a priority, but if we release 0.10 without, it will first
> need a cycle of making this non-standard, and then in a further
> release doing a second softfork to enforce it.
>
> It's a 2-line change; see #5743.
>
> --
> Pieter
>
>
--
--
Gavin Andresen
--001a11c1bfd8e0885f050e331d04
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">I think we should just do it, and include it with the othe=
r DERSIG changes for 0.10.<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmai=
l_quote">On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Pieter Wuille <span dir=3D"ltr">&l=
t;<a href=3D"mailto:pieter.wuille@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">pieter.wuill=
e@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl=
e=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span c=
lass=3D""><br>
</span>I understand it's late, which is also why I ask for opinions. It=
's<br>
also not a priority, but if we release 0.10 without, it will first<br>
need a cycle of making this non-standard, and then in a further<br>
release doing a second softfork to enforce it.<br>
<br>
It's a 2-line change; see #5743.<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--<br>
Pieter<br>
</font></span><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br></div></div></blo=
ckquote></div><div><br></div>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_signature">--<br>Ga=
vin Andresen<br></div>
</div></div>
--001a11c1bfd8e0885f050e331d04--
|
