1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <zgenjix@yahoo.com>) id 1RrN2O-0000zG-Eu
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:10:48 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from nm5-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.90.251])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1RrN2N-0004Zi-Hb for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:10:48 +0000
Received: from [98.138.90.57] by nm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
29 Jan 2012 05:10:41 -0000
Received: from [98.138.86.157] by tm10.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
29 Jan 2012 05:10:41 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1015.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
29 Jan 2012 05:10:41 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 960182.80769.bm@omp1015.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 24227 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jan 2012 05:10:41 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: QXTqmzsVM1khE.QpkTpm4g9MR8eKqR2V4UvCpGQN_peu4Sk
GL4w2hp63PIiCG6Cn_Uy526bFpU.APVoeR6AMy9TPM3Kt.yyuAEAg_AmniBm
JDWCv7l5PopSCDwP0w4Xa96DDBYKsCvTj23u7AoGU32AhYxiTSD33KFCPy.o
urBDICGyIJnkK5D7s50NTuaYmVY61q5vq4TaxyBnX2Eh2QWqqdM1bfhWWo3g
berei7fMZsMMufoS_vvhTZdPer5pSzVtxKSS6MCh01zPF5sv2whVRV7ohPwf
xE_FqmaaOV7iUrnYUQquknVwSEUUPYc_LNLpRCgC_dhETNyB8PT.sjT_gaQu
KXNHYfw0oE8VptZXl0SjCGWsspu.mTzSzspvvFtrEngI11w9erPcUXODJw3.
U52PBmh_wbF16di1ct7aM1WDZ7ZaZ.Igdpp3mTPDk23LuNjeoDqTDiwJbJh.
jPMz0zD.YHpW_z0Be_hOUt_9pMYKr
Received: from [92.20.138.208] by web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:10:41 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.116.331537
References: <1327812740.41242.YahooMailNeo@web121002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <1327813841.99379.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:10:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <1327812740.41242.YahooMailNeo@web121002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [98.138.90.251 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(zgenjix[at]yahoo.com)
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1RrN2N-0004Zi-Hb
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Quote on BIP 16
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:10:48 -0000
2 compressed pubkeys=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0AFrom: Amir Taak=
i <zgenjix@yahoo.com>=0ATo: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" <bi=
tcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>=0ACc: =0ASent: Sunday, January 29,=
2012 4:52 AM=0ASubject: [Bitcoin-development] Quote on BIP 16=0A=0AGavin s=
aid:=0A"Part of the controversy is whether really long bitcoin addresses wo=
uld work-- would it be OK if the new bitcoin addresses were really long and=
looked something like this:=A0=A057HrrfEw6ZgRS58dygiHhfN7vVhaPaBE7HrrfEw6Z=
gRS58dygiHhfN7vVhaPaBiTE7vVhaPaBE7Hr=0A(or possibly even longer)=0A=0AI've =
argued no: past 70 or so characters it becomes a lot harder to copy and pas=
te, a lot harder to scan an address with your eyes to see if you're paying =
who you think you're paying, harder to create a readable QR code, harder to=
upgrade website or database code that deals with bitcoin addresses, etc. T=
here is rough consensus that very-long addresses are not workable."=0A=0AHo=
w could you have a 70 byte long address without a P2SH scheme? Is this a mi=
stake?=0A=0A---------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------=0ATry before you buy =3D See our experts in action!=0AThe m=
ost comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers=0Ais jus=
t $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,=0AMetro =
Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!=0Ahttp://p.s=
f.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2=0A______________________________________________=
_=0ABitcoin-development mailing list=0ABitcoin-development@lists.sourceforg=
e.net=0Ahttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=0A
|
