1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
|
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 805E77A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 01:48:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (mail-ig0-f170.google.com
[209.85.213.170])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1686C1A2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 01:48:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igxp17 with SMTP id p17so95048504igx.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=yvoO7r2qwjQpDSXBIO88OVpNbDJ6aXIXM47lrsyOThM=;
b=OVsnPoSmnfdlCMACMhd7xO/IUUcBEsy6SHLShLvVTDa3+rW/CRmegHTz3pRckaEZku
g67i5lCRydHkO29KwKfZeJy76iyEUBx+zVOddo21p1OZqSVr/ywvC+XOB3tjz5YEAgjb
/fgiyJdMAKolZMJcCXY+qzGlTOnTpateuUlhgGfaBA1nAi5eKUy0+iK5rldR9xpy358+
kqGex9zUI4COv84vS2tNYWgidw3RiLYN5yvW57TBuBqNZVmEYP4EDFQmxad6xnWUUXgU
Vl/H6Xl+74gdX3+Yy3CTH7YGw2gXco6EprrBwh45gEC1Duo5WVUBFoeQrfriHdiNZJci
b/VQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.79.196 with SMTP id l4mr24249028igx.48.1439948918610;
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.14.136 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150819013645.GC2835@muck>
References: <CANOOu=_8BA1REkjRA3OUU_UEk6iOkQDW7=C8bEByAFGF4KHrbg@mail.gmail.com>
<20150819013645.GC2835@muck>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 01:48:38 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQcravsrCY+VKi_25baXWWp01LpAVSHfi5b8ma8G_G6hw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XTs Tor IP blacklist downloading system
has significant privacy leaks.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 01:48:39 -0000
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> tl;dr: Yes, Bitcoin XT has a privacy problem with the automatic Tor exit
> node list download.
It's not a bug, it's a feature: These concerns and others were
specifically called out when we rejected this submission to Bitcoin
Core in favor of a more generic approach that lacks the privacy
problems and avoids being explicitly punitave to the use of Tor.
At least it's not a full on block as soon a the node fills for the
first time like the first implementation.
|
