summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/03/79f723b8e8c80c25a3b162005bcb4b6f47389c
blob: c49f9e718f3b92b519f76460daebe297de2da65c (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>) id 1QpRyu-0003DU-8r
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 05 Aug 2011 21:31:00 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me
	designates 173.246.101.161 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=173.246.101.161;
	envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me; helo=mail.bluematt.me; 
Received: from vps.bluematt.me ([173.246.101.161] helo=mail.bluematt.me)
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1QpRyt-00072B-El for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 05 Aug 2011 21:31:00 +0000
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:ee55:f9ff:fec6:e666] (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:ee55:f9ff:fec6:e666])
	by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 107832563
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri,  5 Aug 2011 23:30:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
To: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201108051403.05506.andyparkins@gmail.com>
References: <201108041423.14176.andyparkins@gmail.com>
	<201108051258.25813.andyparkins@gmail.com>
	<1312545969.4516.8.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me>
	<201108051403.05506.andyparkins@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-g2UvHLnM3I2XRtfMaGDL"
Message-ID: <1312550081.12447.3.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Resent-From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
Resent-To: bitcoin-development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 23:30:50 +0200
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.9 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
X-Headers-End: 1QpRyt-00072B-El
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Double spend detection to speed up
 transaction trust
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 21:31:00 -0000


--=-g2UvHLnM3I2XRtfMaGDL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 14:03 +0100, Andy Parkins wrote:
> I'm arguing that "number of connection slots" isn't the best metric; so t=
hat=20
> wouldn't matter.  Just keep accepting incoming connections (with some san=
ity=20
> limit of course) until you've allocated your bandwidth, not your number o=
f=20
> connections.
Mike and me were talking about outgoing connection count, not incoming,
which is another thing entirely.
However, to your point: having 1000 Bitcoin connection is still almost
no traffic, the only timt you really hit much traffic is when you get a
peer with a client who doesn't have the full chain as they will start
downloading the chain maxing your bandwidth.  My bandwidth of Bitcoin is
something like avg 3GB/month for 125 connections which is nothing.
However it has very brief spikes of my entire outgoing bandwidth.
Thus, neither bandwidth nor connection count are really good metrics for
choosing your number of incoming slots.

Matt

--=-g2UvHLnM3I2XRtfMaGDL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=08uz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-g2UvHLnM3I2XRtfMaGDL--