1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
|
Return-Path: <xor@freenetproject.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD71CDCE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 23 Jan 2016 05:34:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de
[80.67.31.29])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97F1D129
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 23 Jan 2016 05:34:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [77.176.196.139] (helo=anonymous)
by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa
(TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84)
(envelope-from <xor@freenetproject.org>) id 1aMqpl-0003X5-CB
for bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org;
Sat, 23 Jan 2016 06:34:01 +0100
From: xor@freenetproject.org
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Reply-To: xor@freenetproject.org
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 06:33:56 +0100
Message-ID: <1736759.DT0dcscznj@1337h4x0r>
Organization: Freenet Project
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-76-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <87powvy20w.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
References: <87si1rycux.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <2998879.R5sQRbxZRv@1337h4x0r>
<87powvy20w.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3030187.C3199VDnKe";
micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Df-Sender: eG9yQGZyZWVtYWlsLmJvZ2VydC5kZQ==
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:00:55 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Three Month bitcoin-dev Moderation Review
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 05:34:04 -0000
--nextPart3030187.C3199VDnKe
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Thursday, January 21, 2016 03:14:47 PM Rusty Russell wrote:
> +1s here means simpling say "+1" or "me too" that carries no additional
> information. ie. if you like an idea, that's great, but it's not worth
> interruping the entire list for.
>
> If you say "I prefer proposal X over Y because <reasons>" that's
> different. As is "I dislike X because <reasons>" or "I need X because
> <reasons>".
So "+1"ing is OK as long as I provide a technical explanation of why I agree?
While I still think that this is too much of a restriction because it prevents
peer-review, I would say that I could live with it as a last resort if you
don't plan to abolish this rule altogether.
So in that case, to foster peer review, I would recommend you amend the rules
to clarify this.
Example: "+1s are not allowed unless you provide an explanation of why you
agree with something".
--nextPart3030187.C3199VDnKe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=VbYX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart3030187.C3199VDnKe--
|
